VPN services and other security tools won’t be able to protect people from this kind of state-surveillance. What’s next for France’s justice reform bill?

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    France is really at a point of breaking. This is especially sad since France was the de facto leader of libre/foss movement in Europe.

    • Yendor@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most other countries already have these sort of laws. In the US you’d just need a warrant from a Judge - which is laughably easy, especially with FISA warrants.

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as I know, police cannot activate your phone’s camera or microphone to spy on you in the US, even with a warrant. Do you know of something that says otherwise?

  • retat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is this supposed to work? Won’t real criminals just buy more secure devices to circumvent this surveillance?

    • Yendor@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This isn’t going to be regularly used. For the average iPhone user you’d probably need to use Pegasus, which costs something insane like US$60k per target device.

      The more likey vector will be things like Ring doorbells - we already know Amazon will handover footage to Police without even requiring a warrant.

        • Yendor@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not saying they won’t want to use it, but Police have limited budgets like everyone else. A quick google shows the average salary of a police office in France is US$57k. Pegasus is $60k per use. If a police department has to choose between spying on 10 phones or hiring 10 more cops, I think they’re going to choose the extra manpower almost every time.

          • dedale@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            A few things. How do we know it’s going to be Pegasus? How do you know the price, why is it so expensive (and why would anyone assume it to stay so)?

            Because if it actually is Pegasus, the main problem with this bill isn’t surveillance (although it is most definitely a problem),
            but the tacit endorsement of this unregulated infoweapon.

            As the poet said: doubleplusungood.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The average French person is tired of all the terrorist attacks and riots. Without discounting that migration does cause issues, the French are also often quite racist against their Muslim countrymen. They’ll assume it’ll primarily be used to target them.

        I feel sorry for the normal French people. Realistically, the French get a choice in the next election. They’ll likely get to choose between:

        • Macron’s successor: a neo-liberal who wants to expand the surveillance state and further erode hard fought for rights.
        • Le Pen’s successor: an actual fascist running for a party with proven financial ties to Russia, who’ll be even more authoritarian and erode French people’s rights even further, and significantly weaken NATO resolve.
  • coffeewithalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. They don’t grant police that power. The judicial system has that power. Just like it has the power to imprison people.

    • tetris11@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/news/252464873/Google-Triada-backdoors-were-pre-installed-on-Android-devices

      Also, you’re connecting to a nearby cell tower which then relays your connection to the wider web, with an exit point at your VPN provider.

      If the nearby cell tower is compromised, they can try MITM attacks which might not need SSL authentication (e.g. you might have a backdoor on your device that does not require an external certificate to access it (in fact I would be surprised if it would)).

      Doing this before would be illegal. Now it is legal.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        MITM would break any remotely decent VPN. The article talks about being able to activate cameras and what not but offers no explanation of how. This would almost certainly require software to be installed on the target device. I don’t see how this will accomplish any more than making it easier to get geolocation data.

        • ackzsel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The baseband firmware on your phone has access to all hardware resources and can be modified over the cellular connection without your cooperation or knowledge.

          • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It can’t be done by a third party without extreme effort. This requires the cell phone manufacturer to participate along with the cellular service company as well.