So my mother recently bought an ET-2800, By HP we had an HP printer before and we got a new one because the old one would not work with my sister’s Windows 11 Laptop. So I had to set it up for my mother, the manual said you can use it without the app. But there was no way to physically do that. Anyway, I downloaded the app on my phone (android) and the app would not connect to the printer. So I used my mother’s iPhone and it would connect. The setup process was stupid proof. And after I got it all full of ink, it was very painless. However, this is where the H in HP should stand for HELL. Because a few months go by and my sister and my mother need some papers printed. No problem. I thought to myself, so my sister tried to print it wirelessly. Couldn’t find the printer, I said ok maybe it’s a dumb driver, USB didn’t work either. I asked my sister to send it to me, so I can print it on my w540 running rocky 9. Rocky picked up that I needed drivers and installed them. Wireless didn’t work but wired showed up, I thought sweet I can just print the paper and get back to what I was doing. However, when I clicked print, the printer would grab the paper and run it though but not put ink on the paper. My mother asks me to forward the email to her to try to print it on her phone. I send it, and it prints, and the paper come out how it should with ink and the paper is finally printed.

After this experience with this printer, it makes me rather aggravated at this purchase, and no longer want to buy from HP. I have looked at Brother printers and there are no Proprietary ink cartage, and or laser printers. I purely wanted to talk about my experience with HP printers and would like to know what others have for a printer for recommendations, for when eventually HP kills support and makes it a paper weight, I’ve read many negative experiences with HP printer, specially from Lois Ross man and their anti consumer products.

  • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    1 year ago

    HP haven’t always been this bad, but they are this bad now, and nobody should be giving them money.

    • oleorun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Carly Fiorina destroyed HP. She tanked product quality by using cheap plastic parts instead of metal and she can’t manage people. She’s a terrible leader and on a personal level she’s just not right in the head, as she embraces trumpism, is racist, elitist, etc.

        • oleorun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I beg to differ.

          The old LaserJet 4s, 5s, the IIs and IIIs, the 8000 series, all those were great, well built printers with metal frames and heavy duty parts. They were made to last.

          We still have a LaserJet 5M that prints reports hooked up to an airgapped Linux server. The printer never breaks down or needs anything more than toner. Yes, it’s slow. Amusingly slow. The page count is over 250k. The fuser is starting to ghost but it’s easily replaced. We just don’t care enough to do it right now. The printer doesn’t care.

          Try this with any printer built after the Fiorina era and you’d be hard pressed to.

          I’m all ears if you have a specific model in mind that was shit before Carly. Because, before her, HP was an industry leader. Now it’s cheap plastic junk, and it’s squarely on her failure as CEO that led to the company’s demise.

          • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            I take it back. My recall of that CEO had her more recently (like 2015 or so). Must’ve confused with a different company and incompetent CEO.

            • oleorun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Mark Hurd, another former ceo, sexually harassed anything moved.

              HP’s ceo hires have been…interesting. They’ve all been pretty bad.

      • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        She’s also the only person to lose in the same presidential primary twice!

        She lost as a candidate, and then after she conceded, lost again as Ted Cruz’s VP candidate.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t believe the GOP actually pushed her as having “business experience” in her Senate run. She’s often cited as one of the worst CEOs ever. She made HP into another race to the bottom shit company, and it has yet to recover.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      HP was the gold standard back in the day. Money says you can still buy kits and toner for IIIs, IVs, and Vs.

      Work gave me a tiny HP laser when we did a refresh, and it’s a damned beast. Probably 12-yo, thousands and thousands of pages, never a glitch or jam. Toner cartridges are $18 and last forever.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had to stop using my LaserJet 5si. Not because it broke, but because Windows stopped shipping drivers. Could have hacked around it, but I figured that new toner cartridges would be harder to come by if it doesn’t easily work on Windows anymore, so time to move on.

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rule 1: don’t buy an HP printer
    Rule 2: don’t buy an inkjet printer
    Rule 3: don’t buy a printer unless you absolutely need to.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This. Every brother laser printer I’ve ever used (both in my own home and at work) has been reliable and never failed aside from the occasional cartridge change/etc. And even those were proceeded by a dismissible software warning or just caused mild artefacts on the print out. You can still print even when they need maintenance.

      • uberkalden@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brother inkjet really aren’t better than HP. I have one and the scanner doesn’t work if the ink is out. And it reports no ink waaaay too early. I can trick it into printing longer and almost double the life of the cartridges.

        Maybe brother laser jet is better? I’m sure hp laser is too though

        • WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          HP laser is still markedly worse than Brother laser. Much more expensive toner, harder to find and use off-brands, and (in my experience) much higher failure rates.

          In general, toner is more robust than inkjet, but also HP is worse than Brother.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are good reasons to buy an inkjet. Just not any under $150. Photographers don’t touch lasers, but their inkjets might have 11 ink cartridges.

      Rule 3 should be considered more often, though. For what you’re paying for the convenience of printing at home, you can buy a lot of printed pages at FedEx.

    • SuperJetShoes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I 100% agree with this. Sadly, rule #3 applies to me (my job involves dealing with banks and lawyers).

      I have had two HP inkjet printers which were unmitigated dogshit. Money-grabbing, thrown together pieces of shit. You get more types of jams than at a craft jam shop.

      Five years ago, moved to a Brother laser printer. Little difference in purchase cost. AND IT NEVER FAILS.

      I’m now on my second (dropped first one downstairs when moving house) and it is just as reliable.

      Each to their own, but for me: Brother Laser Printer every time.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, HP are terrible now.

    They weren’t always this bad, I had a laserjet 4000 that was made around the turn of the century and it “just worked”.

    • JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still have a LaserJet 2200 and it will be pried from my cold dead hands. The plastic has gone brittle on some spots of it, and the front manual feed cover has long broken but it still dutifully works.

      • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I worked in IT, there was a LaserJet 4 at one office. That thing was almost 2 decades old when i changed careers. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s still there.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s always a post where someone’s asking if HP printers are really as bad as they seem.

    Yes. Yes they are. Spread the word. Friends don’t let friends buy an HP printer.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brother has always been my go-to. I’ve owned exactly two. One I bought in 2009 and one I bought 3-4y ago. They’re basically zero hassle.

        • Jeanschyso@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          When you ask a Linux head what kind of printer to use, they answer “get a Brother laser printer”. Linux YouTube is what sold me on Brother.

          Linux ppl tend to be the biggest shills when it comes to products that respect the consumer.

        • seaQueue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Should be fine, ours supports standard IPP over wireless. My old 2008 printer needed CUPS on a Pi with QEMU and binfmt-misc to support the old brother i386 unix driver but worked flawlessly with that setup in a docker container.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    15 years ago HP was among the best in the business. They made workhorse products that did millions of pages (and those old models continue to)

    Today HP is a malware and telemetry company who won’t let the average consumer use their printer without a logged-in HP account slurping telemetry about every aspect of their lives. Any consumer who buys a printer with the letter “e” in the model number is paying money to be spied on. Anyone who buys a non-“e” model is still doing so, but in a less VISUALLY obvious, and obnoxious way.

    This is not random assumption. I’m a tech. Anyone who buys an HP Printer today and asks me to install them gets a fast education on why they shouldn’t cut the packing tape on that box.

    Buy Brother.

      • Cosmonaut_Collin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have an ecotank and I like it a lot. It setup quick and works wired and wireless. The only thing I don’t like is the print quality feels desaturated. Although I don’t print for any art purposes so it doesn’t matter too much.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was looking to buy an ET. Then I learned about the sponge. While you’re free to refill the ink at little cost there’s also a sponge that cleans the heads or soaks up excess ink. I have forgotten the purpose, but it’s a 2 dollars sponge, you can easily get something like it and replace it. But the printer won’t reset the counter for the sponge. Unless you want to download sketchy stuff off of a Belarusian website, your only option is to ship the printer to Epson and pay them for the trouble.

        That maneuver is about the same price as a new ecotank.

        Since writing the above I did some late-night googling, and it seems that Epson US has caught enough flack for this, and now offers a one time key for a reset utility https://epson.com/support/epson-ink-pads-reset-utility-faqs.

        If I buy a printer it’ll be a brother laser, or a professional inkjet… And I don’t see the latter happening.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have no experience with Epson outside of 1 complete trash-teir $50 inket, which was hot garbage which of course it was- sorry.

      • ThetaDev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They look like good machines if you are printing a lot and need an inkjet (like for photo printing)

        If you are only using a printer occasionally for letters or shipping labels, laser printers are probably a better option. Sure, they need more space, but they cant dry out and dont require cleaning programs.

      • rambos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We have one A3 format in the office for 8 months and its been amazing

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        They do not, at least at this moment in time. Not even close. Not even in the same solar system.

  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For well over 20 years, yes.

    HP practically invented the concept of “destroy the brand name of your high end professional equipment with the worst consumer garbage ever.” Their inkjets are infamous

    They were early pioneers in the art of enshittification.

    • EchoCranium@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the 80s and 90s HP printers were great. They just worked, even in rough dirty manufacturing environments. You could just about drop kick one, and it would still print out a page for you. Now they’re crap. The investment firm that owns the brand is past beating the dead horse, now trying to squeeze every last dollar out of the carcas.

    • kirk781@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The company also prohibits users from trying to use third party inks, right? Also, I am surprised at the app fication of everything. One shouldn’t need an app just to print something. Almost like tech is taking one step forward but HP is taking two step backwards.

  • WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    HP doesn’t stand for “Huge Pain”. It stands for:

    • H - Fuck
    • P - You

    That’s the unofficial moto of the HP company - “Fuck you!”.

    Seriously, anyone who still buys HP products, they disrespect themselves.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      HP laptops were nice … somewhere in 2011.

      And I have two HP mice and an HP keyboard (that one is PS/2, so not very relevant, I guess), which work fine.

      • WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. HP products were used to be great. Still have some decade old printers at some place by HP and they simply work.

        However, HP printer purchased ~5 years ago simply suck ass. And I will never get back hours that I’ve spent fixing it. Or attempting to fix it. Go to hell HP… ☹️☹️☹️

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They ain’t wrong though.

        I went through OP’s pain about 3.5 years ago. My old, old printer from college (an HP, ironically) that was absolute bare bones (I think I actually got it for free as part of a bundle somewhere along the line) but also somehow (or maybe because of that) also a workhorse that never let me down for like 10 years…well I lost the damn proprietary cable in a move.

        So I started shopping for it’s replacement. But before I could, I still needed my printing to be done ASAP, so I went to my parents house. There, we tried printing but their old HP just wasn’t having it. So we bought new ink and tried that. No dice. I tried everything I knew to try and nothing was working.

        So I went to my girlfriend’s parents who also had an HP and we couldn’t get that one to work direct either. Had to eventually email the stuff to them to open on their computer and then with it’s hardwired connection, it finally printed for me.

        Later that week my parents bought a new printer to replace the old one, and inexplicably, went with another HP. For them it was more “this is what was on sale at Sam’s Club” and less the result of careful review reading. But anyway, my mom, with all the tech literacy of a jug of milk, botched the setup. Called me like she always does, to solve her tech issues with only her horrible verbal translation of what’s going on, we can’t do it over the phone, so a few days later I go there and while it is fucked up, IDK how much of that was HP being shitty and how much of that would’ve worked if it hadn’t been attempted by my mom. Regardless, we finally get printer powered up and talking to the computer and it STILL won’t actually print stuff we’re sending it. Until the next day when my mom says she tried it again and it worked, no issues.

        By that point I was fed up with HP, but I still needed a printer, needed color, and was totally against going inkjet yet again.

        Ended up with a Brother color laser printer and it’s been the printer of my dreams from day one.

        In my cramped apartment, it sits in another room from the rest of my computer stuff, quietly waiting on standby for the handful of times each year that I need it, at which point it quietly comes to life, prints perfectly, the first time, every time, and never causes any issues at all.

  • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Big printer companies need to be regulated better by the FTC. The whole cartridge issue is a waste of resources and costs a lot more than it costs to produce.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Printer cartridges create almost as much waste as Keurig K-Cups cartridges. Both should be banned

  • WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    HP sucks donkey balls. Printer, computer, laptop, all-in-one, doesn’t matter. Friends don’t let friends by an HP.

    That said, ET-2800 is an Epson brand printer, specifically the base-model “Eco-Tank” printer that uses bottles of ink instead of cartridges. HP makes a few under the “Super Tank” line. If that’s the right model number, that might help explain driver issues if you have an Epson printer being controlled by HP drivers.

    If you plan on keeping it, make sure to set a calendar reminder or set up a task to print at least one color page every month to keep the ink from drying out in the print head. If you decide to replace it, consider a brother laser, especially the black-and-white only models. They are tanks

    • PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Epson Eco-Tank printers are probably one of the most infuriatingly mislabeled products ever, though. They come with self-destruct timers.

      If their software counter device that their excess ink sponge pad is full (which can happen rather quickly depending on printing behavior and the amount of cleaning cycles), they turn themselves into e-waste. Epson considers the sponge non-serviceable and the only official solution is to buy an entirely new printer with a clean sponge. Absolutely nothing Eco about that.

      There are (paid!) counter reset hacks available now, though.

      So, yeah, fuck Epson, but for very different reasons than op is listing.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will never buy a home printer at this point, especially not from HP. It’s significantly cheaper and more convenient for me to go to a printing center next-door and get everything done for pennies.

    If somehow I had to start printing things in mass quantities, the only option I would consider is something like the Epson EcoTank. You can clearly see how much ink is left, and you can refill it yourself too. They can’t randomly just tell you that your cartridges are faulty, brick your device, or ship you a cartridge that has less than 5ml of liquid inside, but one that costs upwards of 50$ a piece

    • Kerrangutan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      EcoTank printers don’t seem to give a shit what ink you put in them as long as its liquid and preferably the right colour

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Epson uses piezoelectric printer heads, which can print whatever flows. They’re popular for direct-to-garment conversion for that reason.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, pretty much, yes. Their home printers have basically always been this bad. But then inkjets are universally bad anyway.

    HP’s Business class printers for offices and schools are actually pretty good, they make a decent laser printer and they make a decent copier. But their $50 home models have always been garbage.

    As someone who ran a computer lab for years, my advice is this: Always always always buy a laser printer. And personally I’ve had only mixed success with all the major manufacturers HP/Lexmark/Canon. I always recommend Brother because they mostly market to offices and corporations, and nobody wants to upset corporate partners, so they’re incentivized to actually make a good product.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    IT person here. Avoiding HP is a good idea. But a better idea is don’t buy shitty cheap consumer level inkjet printers from any brand. Most of them have this sort of bullshit, although not usually as bad as HP does. Instead I suggest buy it for life. Get a nice color laser machine, spend a few hundred bucks, and you will have a printer that lasts until you die. I like the Canon MF743CDw, it’s a little on the pricier side but it scans both sides of the paper in one pass. Also does color duplex printing.

    If you don’t want the extra size or weight of a color laser, get a black and white laser. How often do you really need color? And if you must get something cheaper, get one of the newer inkjet printers that use refillable ink bottles rather than cartridges, like there is an actual ink tank on the printer and you refill it with a squeeze bottle rather than replacing the cartridge.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      My problem is I only need a printer maybe once or twice a year so it’s a bit difficult to justify spending hundreds of dollars for a device that will probably only pay for itself back in about a decade.

      It may honestly just be worth the hassle I’m going to the library when I want to print something. Not they they don’t have crap printers as well.

      • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Get a Laser then… Inkjets dry out if not regularly used, which on the cheaper printer often means ‘throw it away and buy a new one’ because they don’t have replaceable heads. A laser will happily sit for months idle then spring into life.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’ll pay for itself the first time your shitty inkjet has one cartridge dry up from not being used in a while, so then the software won’t let you print anything at all until you replace all 4 of them with proprietary OEM replacement cartridges.

        That’s one of the main reasons I decided to bite the bullet and spend a few hundred bucks on a color laser. I print so rarely that I wanted a system that wouldn’t dry out from infrequent use.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Then get yourself a basic black & white laser printer. Brother is usually pretty good for that. The cartridges don’t expire and it’ll be ready instantly when you need it, whether that’s tomorrow or next year.

        Here’s one for $120