• neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    University of Otago physicists have used a small glass bulb containing an atomic vapor to demonstrate a new form of antenna for radio waves. The bulb was “wired up” with laser beams and could therefore be placed far from any receiver electronics.

    Apparently it can cover more frequencies than a typical antenna design. Cool

      • neptune@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Really. Wouldn’t broadcasting on all spectrums basically just be noise?

        Edit: the article says “have broad tunability” which I take to mean that no, they just operate on one frequency at a time

        • stifle867@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It covers more frequencies as in wavelengths as in the bigger the wavelength the bigger the length of the antenna (to put it simply). In this case they’re saying you wouldn’t need to make it as large as a conventional antenna to receive the same frequencies, or you could make it large and receive more frequencies.

        • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hmm alright, maybe I misunderstood that part, I was thinking that meant ability to broadcast a gamut of signal.

          • neptune@dmv.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do think it can receive on many frequencies at once. But I think the Fourier transform won’t be able to untangle a signal if that signal is broadcast continuously on all frequencies.

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    that’s great, however

    In particular, this happens for RF frequencies that couple the Rydberg level resonantly to other nearby Rydberg levels. For sufficiently large fields, the atoms are receptive to a broad range of RF signals via the AC Stark shift.

    meaning there’s physical limit on where these bands need to be, outside of these regions it’s less sensitive, and it’s mostly microwaves anyway (authors tested 16-20GHz)

    we are able to make very compact extremely broadband receive (and also transmit) antennas for microwave bands, it’s a log spiral antenna backed with cavity. easily can reach to over 40GHz, much simpler, smaller (counting all optics) and probably with much better sensitivity. already used in radar warning receivers, and has nice property that on lower end it’s limited by size, but on upper end on precision of the central section - so can be made really wideband

    also that’s really just a transducer, still needs a box with lasers and some other machinery that allows for demodulating that optical signal. “RF detector that doesn’t contain metal” is a weird advantage because there’s usually a large amount of metal connections required to actually do something useful with that freshly collected signal

    actual article https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article/123/14/144003/2914151/Distant-RF-field-sensing-with-a-passive-Rydberg

    • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      also that’s really just a transducer, still needs a box with lasers and some other machinery that allows for demodulating that optical signal. “RF detector that doesn’t contain metal” is a weird advantage because there’s usually a large amount of metal connections required to actually do something useful with that freshly collected signal

      30m away (that’s longer than a basketball court!), though, and probably more because this demo was “no particular effort”. I don’t know the use case, but I’m guessing it’s not a home router.

      • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I would probably argue that it’s not so much pointless as it currently has more limited use cases than conventional means. This may or may not change in the future.

  • LongbottomLeaf@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “In October 2018, the United States Army Research Laboratory publicly discussed efforts to develop a super wideband radio receiver using Rydberg atoms. In March 2020, the laboratory announced that its scientists analysed the Rydberg sensor’s sensitivity to oscillating electric fields over an enormous range of frequencies—from 0 to 1012 Hz (the spectrum to 0.3mm wavelength). The Rydberg sensor can reliably detect signals over the entire spectrum and compare favourably with other established electric field sensor technologies, such as electro-optic crystals and dipole antenna-coupled passive electronics.”

    Wikipedia, Rydberg atom

    It’s a neat wiki entry, I recommend it. I hadn’t heard of Rydberg atoms before today.

  • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok so now make an internal receiver laser in favor of quantum entagled pairs, for sensor to receiver transmission unlimited wireless range.