Israel, the United States and Hamas are close to an agreement to free dozens of women and children held hostage in Gaza, in exchange for the first sustained pause in conflict in Gaza, according to people familiar with its provisions.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Five days isn’t enough, but maybe can be stretched out to a real ceasefire by further negotiation?

    If Biden pulls off a ceasefire I’m voting for him. If he doesn’t, I won’t. Simple as.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        don’t shame people into voting for shit, fix your bad candidate problem. bad candidates scare off swing voters in the suburbs worse than progressive candidates

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I will not vote for genocide. That’s my red line. If you vote for the lesser of two genocides you’re still voting for genocide.

        If Biden actually manages to stop Israel from continuing its genocide he has my vote! That’s all it would take and that is not a high bar.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So you vote for nothing and the worst of the two gets in anyway. The family who would’ve otherwise lived in the ‘lesser genocide’ thanks you. In what realm does that make sense?

          • osarusan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            These “red line” commenters are so blinded by their own purity tests that they can’t see they’re actually supporting the greater genocide. Every thread here on lemmy is full of them, and they all make the same case, but they refuse to acknowledge the actual reality, which is that not voting for the one person who has an actual chance to beat Trump, they’re actually supporting him. Not as much as they would if they actually voted for him, but still significantly.

            If Trump wins by a narrow margin, it will be because of these red-liners who valued their own purity over the lives of others.

              • osarusan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                In a way, there’s an argument to be made there. If you’re not doing everything you can to help defeat evil, then you are allowing that evil some amount of support.

                On the other hand, your vote is black and white. By not voting for the one person who has an actual chance to beat Trump, your actions are inarguably are supporting Trump.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Your money is black and white too. By not donating to the one person that has an actual chance to beat Trump, your actions are unarguably supporting Trump. Similarly! By not volunteering your time to the one person that has an actual chance to beat Trump…

                  Zero. Difference.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Trump is already talking about basically ethnically cleansing the us in the context of mass deportation of immigrants and other parts of his “platform”.

          It is less “voting for the lesser of two genocides”. It is preventing the ones you can.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            And by threatening to withhold my vote I’m trying to prevent further genocide in Gaza. We’ve already forced Biden this far, we can force him farther if he realizes it could cost him the election.

            So, no ceasefire, no votes.

            By voting blue-no-matter-who, you’re just making Biden worse.

            • eoddc5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If Biden doesn’t get the ceasefire, you won’t vote for him

              But who would you vote for, then?

              No other candidates, Democrat or Republican, that run again Biden will be able to get the ceasefire, either - come time to vote.

              So….you won’t vote at all?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’ll vote downticket for Democrats and write Hillary Clinton in to the Presidential spot.

                Democrats in the House and Senate would rein in Trump and it’s still Her turn!!!

                • eoddc5@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not against her as a candidate, but you know writing her in will just waste a vote.

                  There’s also no promise that if she were in the potus seat right now that she could definitively broker a ceasefire. We don’t know how any of it would work with anyone else.

                  Let’s give Biden a chance.

                  (Btw im all for voting for another deserving candidate who runs against him on the Democratic ticket)

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Clinton. You’d vote for Clinton in this theoretical scenario as to who would get your vote in negotiating a ceasefire as president during this crisis.

                  The Hillary Clinton who has expressly opposed a ceasefire during this very crisis.

                  That Clinton.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the 51st state, our own little monster that we’ve fed and created.

          Jesus Christ. Imagine believing that.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Imagine believing Israel is somehow able to survive without a steady supply of support from the entire Western world.

            If the US pulled support, pretty much every NATO country would do the same thing. They’d be alone in the world in a region surrounded by countries opposed to Zionism. Hell, just take those warships out of the Gulf and things would turn very quickly.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              “every NATO country would do the same thing”

              Who else is materially supporting Israel in NATO, again?

              Is NATO just the fucking illuminati, at this point, as an excuse for everything you don’t like?

              Do you not remember what happened in the first twenty-five years of Israel’s existence?

              Do you not know how US-Israel relations were in that period?

              … do you know anything about the history of this region?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Who else is materially supporting Israel in NATO, again?

                Diplomatic support matters, but also, the UK has sent ships and planes to support Israel, the European Union’s executive arm announced it was suspending all aid to the Palestinian territories, Germany offers Israel military help and promises to crack down at home on support for Hamas , like are you serious?

                Also, this is not the 1950s! You’re living in the past, the Israel of today is run by the soft sons of the ones who conquered Palestine. Their soldiers aren’t warriors, they’re concentration camp guards and dronies and desk jockies. There’s a reason they’ve lost tanks trying to take Gaza.

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Diplomatic support matters, but also, the UK has sent ships and planes to support Israel, the European Union’s executive arm announced it was suspending all aid to the Palestinian territories, Germany offers Israel military help and promises to crack down at home on support for Hamas , like are you serious?

                  I made the comment in response to “Imagine believing Israel is somehow able to survive without a steady supply of support from the entire Western world.”

                  Show me the steady supply of support from NATO countries other than the US, not the immediate reaction to a civilian massacre.

                  Also, this is not the 1950s! You’re living in the past, the Israel of today is run by the soft sons of the ones who conquered Palestine. Their soldiers aren’t warriors, they’re concentration camp guards and dronies and desk jockies. There’s a reason they’ve lost tanks trying to take Gaza.

                  “Soft sons”, “their soldiers aren’t warriors”

                  Jesus Christ. And tankies wonder why people call them red fash.