• hypelightfly@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What conclusion do you think I’ve jumped to?

    Also, transcripts don’t solve the problem of shit content designed for video. It’s the same script.

    • Rustmilian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What conclusion do you think I’ve jumped to?

      Not you, but others clearly have.

      Also, transcripts don’t solve the problem of shit content designed for video. It’s the same script.

      And? The Transcript shows you annotations to the sources. If you don’t want to watch the video or read the Transcript then go read the 48 different sources compiled to make the video.

      Too many sources to read & go through? Sounds like a you problem.

      shit content designed for video

      There’s your conclusion you jumped to right there.

      • hypelightfly@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No jumping involved. I read the transcript, it’s shitty clickbait content. You’re being awfully hypocritical with your assumptions.

        I don’t disagree with the conclusions, the issue is with how it’s being presented.

        • Rustmilian@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          shitty clickbait content.

          No it’s not. You realize a video title can be true to a videos content without giving everything away right?
          You ever hear “Don’t judge a book by its cover”? This is it.