We believe that the key encapsulation mechanism we have selected, CRYSTALS-Kyber, is built on solid foundations, but to be safe we do not want to simply replace our existing elliptic curve cryptography foundations with a post-quantum public key cryptosystem. Instead, we are augmenting our existing cryptosystems such that an attacker must break both systems in order to compute the keys protecting people’s communications.

Our new protocol is already supported in the latest versions of Signal’s client applications and is in use for chats initiated after both sides of the chat are using the latest Signal software. In the coming months (after sufficient time has passed for everyone using Signal to update), we will disable X3DH for new chats and require PQXDH for all new chats. In parallel, we will roll out software updates to upgrade existing chats to this new protocol.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A nice and reasonable approach.

    I just wonder why doubling up the cyphers is the way to go? Not confident in the post-quantum cipher yet?

  • kanzalibrary@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never predict Signal will implement this QuanResist really fast pace than other messenger apps. Applause to the dev team!

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    We believe that the key encapsulation mechanism we have selected, CRYSTALS-Kyber, is built on solid foundations, but to be safe we do not want to simply replace our existing elliptic curve cryptography foundations with a post-quantum public key cryptosystem.

    Does this sound like VX Junkies to anybody else? I feel the need to check on my turbo encabulator 😅

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The original machine had a base-plate of prefabulated aluminite, surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two main spurving bearings were in a direct line with the pentametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented. The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-bovoid slots in the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a non-reversible tremie pipe to the differential girdlespring on the “up” end of the grammeters.

  • incompetentboob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do we still like signal? I remember reading something about why you should stop using signal but this seems contrary to that

    • Yesbutnotreally@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People dislike Signal because of the phone number. The problem is, in my opinion, that all the “more secure” messengers lack features to ever be somewhat mainstream. I think most privacy experts and enthusiasts still consider Signal to be the gold standard of E2EE messengers.

      Edit: Forgot to mention centralised servers, but if you dig a little bit deeper than then top layer of that, it’s not an issue.

      • sudneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many people also fail to make a proper distinction between private and anonymous, which is why some people get mad at the phone number thing.

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, yes, I’m not giving an instant messenger application my phone number, it doesn’t need it, especially if I’m not even using it on a phone.

        That’s private information that I only give out to close friends and family members.

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The phone number thing is a major problem but Signal just has the momentum imo. Ultimately, they’re gonna need to fix it or we’re all going to have to stop using it.

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      For every thing on this world, there will be people disliking this thing and being very vocal about it.