thehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoOpinion: The Copyright Office is making a mistake on AI-generated artarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down126cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up125arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: The Copyright Office is making a mistake on AI-generated artarstechnica.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoAh, so you meant “there’s not a single downside to me.”
minus-squareBURN@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoNothing of value is lost. Generative AI does not create anything new. It’s exclusively a benefit to artists
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoNothing of value to you is lost. We already know you don’t care about other people, no need to keep repeating that.
Ah, so you meant “there’s not a single downside to me.”
Nothing of value is lost. Generative AI does not create anything new.
It’s exclusively a benefit to artists
Nothing of value to you is lost. We already know you don’t care about other people, no need to keep repeating that.