cyu@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago"waves of technological innovation" have gotten faster over time, "students might now find themselves learning skills in college that are obsolete by the time they graduate"www.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1203arrow-down138cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1165arrow-down1external-link"waves of technological innovation" have gotten faster over time, "students might now find themselves learning skills in college that are obsolete by the time they graduate"www.businessinsider.comcyu@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square56fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareEnglish Mobster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoOne thing I found especially dumb is this: Jobs that require driving skills, like truck and taxi drivers, as well as jobs in the sanitation and beauty industries, are least likely to be exposed to AI, the Indeed research said. Let’s ignore the dumb shit Tesla is doing. We already see self-driving taxis on the streets. California allows self-driving trucks already, and truck drivers are worried enough to petition California to stop it. Both of those involve AI - just not generative AI. What kind of so-called “research” has declared 2 jobs “safe” that definitely aren’t?
One thing I found especially dumb is this:
Let’s ignore the dumb shit Tesla is doing. We already see self-driving taxis on the streets. California allows self-driving trucks already, and truck drivers are worried enough to petition California to stop it.
Both of those involve AI - just not generative AI. What kind of so-called “research” has declared 2 jobs “safe” that definitely aren’t?