• Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    1 year ago

    GenXer here. What drives me nuts is that climate change was taught to me as scientific fact in year 9, back in the early 80s.

    The science was clear but collectively every government said “well, I’ll be dead by then so why should we care now”.

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Back then I remember it being all about the ozone layer. Then all the governments got together, did some stuff, and seemed to fix the problem there. Then people kind of stopped talking about it. There was Captain Planet and various things like that, but after the ozone layer panic passed, people stopped caring.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        1 year ago

        Governments got off their collective assess and did something about the ozone layer and acid rain to the point that the problem has largely been corrected. Unfortunately, although climate change and now micro plastics get a lot of media attention, governments have since stopped trying to actually do something about it.

        • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There is a big difference between the ozone layer, acid rain and climate change.

          Ozone: Required the move to different refrigerant gasses and implement measures to stop old cfc’s being accidentally released.

          acid rain: Required the use of low sulfur fuels.

          While both were costly they were minor in comparison to climate change emissions.

          The problems were incidental to the industries involved and not a something that had to happen for the industry to function.

          And the big one, they industries that were required to change could profit from the change.

          The complete opposite for co2 emissions.

          There is no way to burn coal or oil without producing co2. So there was zero incentive from the companies and countries that profit from these industries to even look at solutions . Let alone implement them.

          • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The difference was that Ronald Reagan had had skin cancer so he actually took it seriously and listened to the scientists.

            Conservatives never believe anything until it effects them. Sonder is a foreign concept to them, along with empathy. Out of sight; out of mind.

        • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I recently read a study about micro plastics that fairly well substantiates tires as their most of prolific source.

          Think the media is gonna run with that? What would be seen as an attack on car culture itself, fuck the science or concerns of health effects. Micro plastics in the clouds, in the Arctic, in the placenta…

          I’m not holding my breath.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Millennial checking in. School system pivoted to Acid Rain and deforestation as the main environmental we would face. Oh, and El Nino, seems like that was happening every year of my life as a kid.