is it a formatting step that an image goes through when uploaded? I’m tired of converting image after image back into jpg, so if there’s like a step I can take to avoid it being a webp, it would help to know

  • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just change .webp to .jpg and it works fine. I’m not sure what that does though or even if it’s necessary.

    • harmonea@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, doing that does absolutely nothing. Your image viewer still reads it as the webp it is, and it knows to do so seamlessly because it’s reading the file header (the first few bytes of the file) instead of the file extension.

      For an analogy, you’re basically just putting a wig on it and pretending it’s your girlfriend from the next school over when everyone in the room knows it’s your skeezy neighbor and is just humoring you.

      • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it tells you it doesn’t accept webp and you change it to jpg and it works, I guess it’s doing something, lol. I’m sure it doesn’t change the file type, it’s a loophole.

        • NullPointerException@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          fair but “it” here is pretty vague. my guess is that, in your case, whatever part of “it” that processes the image handles webp files just fine but for some reason the devs made “it” reject file extensions that don’t match “.jpeg”, “.png”, “.whatever_else” for some reason before the file gets handled further.

          • kramo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They most likely limit image formats to just a few for feature parity across systems. They can be sure that those formats will be handled by whatever library they use in other places, in the future, or on other operating systems. Whereas with less common formats, that might not be the case.

          • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Even if a webp is still accepted, I still have that distrust though. The marketing people should have let everyone who works with pics know what they are. I use non-standard software so maybe that’s why I’m clueless as to what it actually does. Again, I’ve got a lot on my plate so it never really comes up as first priority to figure out what it is.

            Edit: I thought you were someone else, sorry about that. Still leaving it since it’s still valid, lol.

            • Turun@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              It would be helpful for the discussion if you would tell us what the mystery program is, that is handling images in this strange way and what operating system you are on.

              • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t remember, it was a while ago. I’m on windows 10 and I use Affinity for all photo editing. I think it had something to do with a header for a site, that’s the distant memory anyway. That’s kind of my point, I remember the distrust but not the circumstances. As I told someone else, I’m not trying to bust anyone’s balls, feel free to ignore me. I’m just trying to give you the every man perspective. It is just mine and only one perspective.