Australians have resoundingly rejected a proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in its constitution and establish a body to advise parliament on Indigenous issues.

Saturday’s voice to parliament referendum failed, with the defeat clear shortly after polls closed.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So the No side’s campaign was one of deliberately not educating people? To me that just says that people educated on the subject are voting Yes.

    While that may be an absurdly simple slogan, it is also absurdly stupid.

    • Cypher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only Territory to vote yes, out of all our States and Territories, was the Australian Capital Territory which is the most educated and most involved with governance.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand why the media is so desperate to frame the result around cost of living. It was clearly about education.

      • Staccato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just Google it, the advice you always hear when the other person is shutting down any more conversation. What an unfortunate result

        • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Google it” vs “no”. The point of the slogan was to highlight a) how the other side was shutting down the conversation and b) that their premise of ignorance was stupid, in a short pithy way.

          It wasn’t saying “go find out”, so much as “you CAN find out if you care, there is no reason to not know”

          That said, without question, the Yes campaign’s official messages were pretty poor. Supporters have been far more eloquent.

          On the “just google it” topic, this short video was brilliantly well done: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SAqIypjk-5A

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which isn’t in any way how it works. You’re making the claim, you sell it. I’m not going digging to make someone’s claim on their behalf.

    • Elliemac@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The ‘No’ campaign was largely nonexistent. The ‘Yes’ campaign was enough reason to vote ‘No’. And the ‘No’ voters are just as educated as ‘Yes’ voters. It’s just that some people can’t understand why other people would disagree with them.

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some are educated, some are racist - no reason they can’t be both.

        It’s easy to understand ignorance and racism.

        (There’s a third option, and that’s for the mining magnates like Clive who want less complaining about digging up sacred sites)