• RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Advertisers didn’t like their ads running next to a nazi tweet until they saw how much money they could make off nazis after one of them was made potus.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nope, they still don’t. Except pillow guy. Hence why the nazi networks keep falling and why x is failing.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a reason Twitter is failing, but it’s not the reason. Even without the nazis they’d be struggling because their owner just keeps making bad financial and business decisions like not paying rent, trying to rebrand, and illegal firings

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh. He doesn’t pay rent to cut costs, he fires to cut costs. All of this is because he wants to run twitter as a nazi platform that doesn’t have advertising backing. Advertising is the only reason a free service like Twitter can exist, and the nazis are the reason that the advertisers left.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s also because he overpaid for it. It’d be in bad but recoverable shape without this behavior and his desire to run it as a Nazi platform. But all of it is connected. He wouldn’t’ve made the hasty decisions to purchase if he didn’t want to run it as a Nazi platform and struggle with impulse control, but also had he found himself in the position of owning it with the massive loss in value from purchase price caused by his waiving of due diligence at the worst possible time he still could’ve hunkered down and treated it like a company he owns and wants to be profitable. From there he could cut costs at reasonable pace, listened to management as to how to minimize headcount, and done market research to maximize value to shareholders. But most notably he could’ve done reasonable cost cutting and made it a Nazi platform. It was gonna hemorrhage money either way. He just decided to be an idiot about it.

            So what’s the problem with it? Elon. Not one single facet of him, though his impulse control is likely high up there, but all of him. At every point he’s making the decisions that ordinary people can see are financially unwise against all advice of experts and professionals. Decisions he should know better than to make.

            • Aqarius@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              He didn’t even want to buy it, he was trying to pump and dump, the court made him go through with the purchase.

            • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              He’s also the only shareholder now AFAIK, though that’s based on loans, so those lenders can do a takeover of sorts (maybe? I’ve only read some headlines claiming that)

    • Jerkules_Jerkules@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      platforms driven by user created content like the nazis, and other extreme right ideologues, because the audience for them consumes that content like religious zealots going to services, getting in their daily requirements of indoctrination. This inflates user engagement. However, the businesses advertising their services, and products, on those platforms do not like their company being associated with these people.