• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    In this press release Hamas said they tried to release more prisoners but Israeli wouldn’t accept them.

    If Hamas is being genuine, there shouldn’t be any tit for tat on a humanitarian hostage release.

    I’m just trying to demonstrate how The Hamas statement feels demonstrably disingenuous. Because they have other options.

    Hamas is not a good actor, the plight of the people in the Gaza strip does not helped by Hamas being such a bad actor.

    • ???@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      From what I understand they released two hostages via the Red Cross and things went fine. I think Hamas willing to return hostages is a good thing. Why won’t Israel take them up on it despite them already releasing two? Most likely imo because Israel’s long term goals include genocide and their handling of the hostage situation so far has been shit.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think the balance of probability is demonstrates that’s Hamas is lying here. If they wanted to release two hostages, with no strings attached, they could simply drop them off at the Red Cross, the UN, or at the Egyptian border. To claim that they need Israelis agreement, and support to release a hostage is extremely disingenuous.

        Honestly, it sounds like they’re just trying to get a sound bite for propaganda purposes. It doesn’t matter that it’s obviously a lie, the people who can see it’s a lie aren’t the ones the propaganda’s for.

        • ???@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          . If they wanted to release two hostages, with no strings attached, they could simply drop them off at the Red Cross, the UN, or at the Egyptian border.

          They did drop two hostages to the Red Cross just 2 days ago.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Great. Why can’t they do that again? Why press release that Israel is preventing them from releasing two more hostages with no strings attached?

            • ???@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              1 year ago

              No one said or suggested they can’t do thart again. It’s saying Israel doesn’t want to cooperate.

              I don’t want to believe Hamas straight away but Israel is the one with the track record of lies.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                My point is, why does it matter if Israel cooperates or not? There’s many places to release the hostages to that aren’t Israeli.

                So this press release, and the implication of it, looks like straight propaganda based on a lie.

                • ???@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Why does it matter if Israel, whose citizens and visitors are hostages, responds to a request to release the hostages?

                  Give me a break. Israel always gets absolved in everything doesn’t it.

                  Yeah it could be propaganda but your reasoning is really deficient here.

                  • jet@hackertalks.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m sorry you think that way. I am genuinely pro-Palestinian freedom. Antiapartheid. But I’m not going to take propaganda at face value. We have to critically think about all the data we’re getting.

                    Hamas saying they are unable to release two hostages is false on the face of itself. To claim that they are unable to release hostages because of Israeli resistance is also demonstrably false. We both agree, in this very conversation, the Hamas could drop off anybody they want to the Red Cross at any time. The fact that they’re unwilling to do that, and blame Israel, demonstrates this is a false propaganda narrative.

                    This is not a dichotomy, you’re not pro-Hamas or pro Israeli. There’s more positions to that. Both of the belligerent military forces here have demonstrated themselves to lie constantly. We can dislike both of them and still want Palestinian freedom, and the end of apartheid.

                    But if my logic is incorrect, please help me understand my logical errors here.

              • DanL4@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Internally, Netanyahu can’t afford to reject any semi reasonable offer. He also wants to be able to say he did anything positive. He’ll hopefully be crucified no matter what, but in his eyes nothing is his fault and he’s working hard at getting points for any achievement and blaming everything and anyone in the past millenia.