• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    In other words, those are questions that, if you answered honestly, would undermine your whole argument that the police were justified.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        I see, so your justification for the police shooting someone is that they shouldn’t feel entitled to not be shot.

        • crossmr@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          9 months ago

          You have a choice. You can be right and dead. Or you can be alive and sort it out later.

          I never said that she deserved to be shot or that the cops were justified. I only explained why they shot her and why they’re likely not to face any consequences for this. I gave no personal judgement. Here is the problem with people like you, you have absolutely no ability for nuance. Anyone who doesn’t immediately cheerlead everything you say 100% must mean that they’re 100% against you and should be attacked.

          it’s funny because your behaviour embodies what you claim you’re raging against.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            9 months ago

            Your words:

            They didn’t imagine the gun. The girlfriend confirms that she picked up her gun and went to the door. If the police are there and banging on the door, you don’t pick up a gun and walk to the door in America.

            Sure sounds like you’re justifying what they did to me.

            I gave no personal judgement.

            That’s ridiculous. This entire time, you’ve been judging her actions.

            Also, it’s pretty funny that you are complaining about being accused of judging people and then end your post by judging me.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                9 months ago

                You come in carrying on about freedom of speech

                Now that’s just a lie. This is all that I said in regards to the U.S. Constitution:

                Weird, I thought there was this thing called the second amendment that gun advocates always say is necessary to defend yourself against tyranny.

                I’m going to ignore the rest of your post because you decided insults and lies are the way to go forward.

                • crossmr@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  18
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Now that’s just a lie. This is all that I said in regards to the U.S. Constitution:

                  You’ve repeatedly posted the ‘it’s totally legal’ claim.

                  She was inside her home. The gun was her property. She had it legally

                  she did something that, again, was 100% legal,

                  she was holding her legal property inside her own home (posted that one twice)

                  Your words.

                  That’s how we’re playing this game isn’t it?

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    14
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    You don’t actually know that second amendment is about the right to bear arms and the first amendment is about freedom of speech, do you?

          • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            If that’s what you really meant from the start and if you know that people struggle with nuance then why didn’t you say what you just said instead of insulting people?