Came across this article, and it’s a very interesting take on how Star Trek has changed with the times, and how modern audiences seem to have a harder time trusting institutions or imagining Trek’s utopia.

  • Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    A good article that I unfortunately can’t read much of due to a pay wall.

    I think my main question would be: so I wasn’t around in the 1960s… but I can’t imagine the average Star Trek viewer was sitting around thinking “yep, that’s what real life is going to be like” in the future, even with a somewhat more optimistic culture.

    I think Star Trek is more aspirational. It aspires to have this society where most everyone is very professional, very intelligent, very emotionally controlled and empathetic, etc. The newer seasons seem to miss some of this especially on that professionalism front. The kind of “British stiff upper lip” stereotype. It’s harder to imagine this utopia future without a significant change in how everyone acts and talks in their day to day lives, and modern Star Trek doesn’t really capture that latter part (imo). It makes it feel like society just kind of “stumbled into” a utopian society

      • Minotaur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s all good! I appreciate you posting, and I understand that websites like that need to get money from somewhere.

    • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The newer seasons seem to miss some of this especially on that professionalism front. The kind of “British stiff upper lip” stereotype.

      This presumes that that sort of stoicism is particularly aspirational or healthy, and I don’t think there’s anything close to universal consensus on that one.

      I think something that gets missed in discussions of “utopia” is that it’s not real. Utopia is not attainable, because there is no universal definition of what that would look like. It exists as a dream of the future, but that’s all.

      • Minotaur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        At least to me, I find it pretty aspirational. But I can see how others would differ on that regard.

        Regardless, I appreciate that this is still seen through a few different lenses. The Klingon for example are like… notably emotional. A Klingon being quick to anger is one of their defining traits. Yet they’re still very “respectful” in their own way, with that code of honor being very key to their society.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Modern Trek has no actual vision; it has nostalgia. Which is a terrible substitute it frankly is the opposite in many ways.

      • Minotaur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Modern Trek (by which I mean SNW) is very very close to being good to me. Something about the dialogue just throws me off though, along with the hour long episodes not really suiting the subgenre imo.

        I think people are genuinely trying to make SNW good, just kind of a lightning in a bottle scenario