Maxim Dounin announces the freenginx project.

As such, starting from today, I will no longer participate in nginx development as run by F5. Instead, I’m starting an alternative project, which is going to be run by developers, and not corporate entities:

    • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
      0·
      9 months ago

      No, it’s very good, corpo lovers however hate it because it cuts the hands of corpo trash and also lax licenses

      • scratchandgame@lemmy.mlTiếng Việt
        0·
        9 months ago

        It’s really good that I cannot statically link with something GPL or AGPL licensed without licensing my software GPL?

        GNU is failing, in the rise of Chimera Linux.

        corpo lovers however hate it

        (After capitalism is socialism. When corpo can’t exist along with the society, we will help you in political and you will help us to get from poverty to capitalism, to achieve socialism as soon as possible?)

        because it cuts the hands of corpo trash and also lax licenses

        So *GPL aren’t considered free software, they are just open source, because they restrict modification and redistribution. Then you borned the term FOSS which is superfluous, to get the BSD license and GPL in the same house?

        (GNU still illegally use the term “free software”)

        • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
          0·
          9 months ago

          Yes it is, that’s the point

          Look at the corporate exploitation of free software and see that Stallman was right

          • scratchandgame@lemmy.mlTiếng Việt
            0·
            9 months ago

            Chimera Linux is the point.

            But it is project’s philosophy, both BSD and GNU project will flame us if you teach them about licensing things

            Disaster comes from our mouth

            • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
              0·
              9 months ago

              Lol some shitty distro used by almost nobody, and serves no interest other than corpo lover’s interests

              • scratchandgame@lemmy.mlTiếng Việt
                0·
                9 months ago

                At least I escape unreadable and unmodifiable GNU stuff

                I saw your interest in Marxism-Leninism. Marx taught: Labor productivity is the premise for this society to win over the old society (poorly translated because I read translated textboot)

                (Năng suất lao động là tiền đề để xã hội này chiến thắng xã hội cũ)

                So the communists must learn to do business. Otherwise it is dogma, moralism (and soon become revisionism). Look at Viet Nam, we would have a pure capitalist government if we don’t switch to market economy (reactionalists backed by US would rebel and they are supported by 3/4 Vietnamese poor people). Now poverty has fallen into history.

                • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
                  0·
                  9 months ago

                  Nothing prevents GNU software to do business, as already proven by quite many successful corporations. BSD and MIT licenses will only result in exploitation, e.g Sony and Apple who take fruits of open source labor and give nothing back. The bourgeoisie is only inclined to enslave the proletariat and it’s labor, GPL stands in it’s way.

                  • scratchandgame@lemmy.mlTiếng Việt
                    01·
                    9 months ago

                    Nothing prevents GNU software to do business

                    GNU already stated themselves, but they prohibit modification and redistribution: any modification must also fall under GPL. Perhaps I want my code public domain or 0BSD? In practical, commercial also mean modified.

                    From your writing I have seen you as a dogmatism of Marxism-Leninism. That’s revisionism. Nowadays new Marxism learn about Marxism-Leninism, then talk about how the business could get better, and competitive with other Marxism (to make money for the capitalists.) to produce more high-quality products

                    Anyone dislike? Marxism is always against dogmatism.