• thejevans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It costs money to host something like that. You want low latency, real-time routing and tile-rendering? Even more money. Sure, it could be funded by donations or something like that, but I’m not holding my breath.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        What is the cost of hosting a server like this? I’d imagine someone could cloud host it at a cost of $10/mo and sell the online service at $1-$2/mo, which would take very few users to turn a profit. If the code is FOSS, some people would be willing to pay for the service.

        • thejevans@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If you’re willing to spend all the money on setting up and running a server, why not just spend way less money to get more phone storage and use OSM?

          • tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Setting up a server just for this is clearly overkill, but if you already have a homeserver it would be great to be able to deploy the backend. Sadly there is no such thing currently

            • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I totally agree. Running a server on a home machine that’s already running 24/7 is trivial. I don’t know why this guy is acting like it’s a big deal. I’ve got a $100 mini-PC running multiple servers already. What’s one more?

              • thejevans@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s not a BIG deal. I self-host a ton of stuff. It’s just a bigger deal than spending a bit more for phone storage for the vast majority of people.

                • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Not necessarily. Most people in the US are locked into some kind of ridiculous contract that makes swapping/upgrading their phone a pain in the ass and a financial burden. To be fair, these same types of people probably lack the ability to run a home server so maybe my point is moot 😅