Thoughts?

  • UncleClerk@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is really good to hear. The worst thing about mid range android phones is the lack of future software support. Even flagship androids aren’t anything to write home about. As much as people like shitting on apple, they support their devices for quite a while compared to other manufacturers.

    • GambaKufu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most Android manufacturers are using minimal development teams to get closed source blobs from the CPU+radios OEMs to talk to the OS. Like the article says, Qualcomm stop supporting older generations of their SoCs pretty quickly, and those manufacturers don’t invest the resources in custom development, which is the LineageOS approach that Fairphone are taking. There’s nothing to promise these updates will be stable and secure though.

      Apple has a huge advantage in developing their own processors from start to finish. They’re not reliant on anyone else’s code, and if they do need to buy in certain components (like Intel modems that they’ve used before), they’ve got the size and budget to get pretty much anyone to agree to their terms. It’s why Google started the Tensor project, which is rumored to be finally going full Google (ending reliance on Samsung) from 2025/Pixel 9.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still think that open standards would better enable long-term support than more effective vertical integration.

        We need an open source smartphone.

          • highduc@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would be great if it would actually be usable.

            From what I’ve read from people owning it it’s unfit for any purpose at the moment and very few people actually use it as their main phone.

            Pine64’s model of “we build the hardware, the community builds the software” doesn’t seem to be working very well unfortunately.

            • Sam@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Its not even software issues (I mean the software is still very early, but improving), the pinephone hardware is ridiculously underpowered while simultaneously drawing too much power.

              The Pro fixes the underpowered issue, but gives you a couple hours of screen-on time. At first I was hopeful software updates would fix the battery life, but the same operating system (postmarketos) gives me a full day of use on my other phone (oneplus6). That leads me to believe it’s largely a hardware issue.

              I hope I’m wrong. \o/

      • UncleClerk@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good explanation. Even if their long term support doesn’t work out it’s nice to see a trend towards long term support and reduction of e-waste.

      • UncleClerk@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Believe it or not, some people aren’t big on over consumption and want things to last. Companies should do better and not produce crap that’s going to end up in landfill in a few years.

          • UncleClerk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I believe someone else in this thread has mentioned this already, For most people the feature set on phones has been stagnant for many years. Most users have their use case met already and additional features are really just bloat (for the most part). Not all people are into tech, and a phone is simply a tool. And therefore don’t always want/need the latest and greatest.