In the last 5 to 10 years everything seems to suck: product’s and services quality plummeted, everything from homes to cars to food became really expensive, technology stopped to help us to be something designed to f@ck with us and our money, nobody seems to be able to hold a job anymore, everyone is broke. Life seems worse in general.

Why? Did COVID made this happen? How?

  • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    You’re finally realizing the end game of capitalism. The 1% trying to hoard everything and milk 99% of the population. I call them piggies because they’re gluttonous with money.

    Edit: you’re

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        nice meme, bold of you to assume however that all rich people don’t take all the money from the state they can get their hands on

        • anarchotaoist@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          ALL rich people? That would be quite the assumption! Many rich are parasites that use regulatory capture, artificial cartels, lobbying, bribery, threats etc because the state exists. Other rich have attained great value by giving the world much value. Don’t let envy eat you away!

          • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Do you think they would be unable to form their cartels if the state was abolished? Pray tell, what’s to stop them from doing so?

            • anarchotaoist@links.hackliberty.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              The question should be who will enable their cartel without the state law enforcing it? What is to stop them get a large share of the market - cartel status? Well, their competition providing better goods and services!

                • anarchotaoist@links.hackliberty.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  NAP, aka respect for private property rights. If a society does not respect the NAP then it is a society based foremost on the threat of violence. What is government - the threat of violence - the threat of force. So, if a society allowed private militia to kill competitors you would end up with a gang ruling over others - you know - like government. So, yes you need a society with respect for private property rights/NAP. Would all people be peaceful? Heck no! Does this mean there will also not be private institutions that uphold the law - uphold respect for private property rights? Of course! People will still need security, decision making and justice! A peaceful society with respect for the NAP would NOT allow a private militia to violate others rights! Business (in the absence of government favouritism) survives on good products, services and reputation. Sending a militia against you opponents does not do well for your reputation! So ultimately you have a choice - government, which is an involuntary institution with a monopoly on force and rule making that serves the elite to the detriment of others OR A free society with respect for private property rights that is more decentralised and snuffs out any trouble makers.

                  • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    So who decides the law and how does justice get upheld in this system? It seems to me that if any corporation becomes powerful enough, it essentially becomes the de-facto government in any areas it has control over.