• Wander@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hooray! Younger generations will finally be able to experience the joy of dropping their phone and having to pick up three to four different pieces! /s

    (I’m all for this change, by the way)

  • arseneau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is awesome. Thank god for EU legislation that directly benefits me as an American consumer. Now I can microwave lithium ion batteries in peace!

  • M-Reimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And now they just have to force manufacturers to either at least security patch devices for, let’s say 10 years, or force them to open source everything the community needs to continue supporting this device. It never happened to me that the battery died before support ended.

    Just had that issue with my Pixel 3a XL. No more security updates. Had to replace it with a Pixel 6a but I liked the 3a XL more. It there was any community support for the 3a XL, I would rather sell my 6a again.

  • got2best@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do y’all remember the days when you dropped your phone and it exploded into 3 or 4 pieces? 🤣 Those were the good days.

    • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Three. Battery, cover and the rest. Weirdly, no damage to the plastic display. How? I guess it was the weather bezel

      • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And when you scratched up the back you bought a new one for $12. No $200 glass or machined aluminum cases that we put $35 covers on just to protect them from every day use.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t wait to hear the Apple marketing word for this feature. They’ll add some gimmick like the battery is held in with magnets and say “We call it MagPack and we think you’re going to love it.”

  • konalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually love all these regulations on smartphones (mainly by the EU), like the recent USB-C standard. That one in particular makes it so much easier to share chargers around the house!

  • TheSaneWriter@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this goes through, I think it would be really good news. Battery failure is one of the leading things that force people to replace their smartphones, and having them be replaceable would go a long way towards making smartphones last longer.

  • hyorvenn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fairphone 3 user here. My main reason to choose this phone a few years ago was because the battery could easily be replaced. Too many phones are perfectly functional but the battery is half dead. Another boon of non-glued batteries : You can carry two (or more) batteries to easily switch when the first one is KO. Meaning no need for portable charger and useless cables in your pocket. Phone at 10% ? Just change it, bam 100% in a second. Easy as that.

    I’ll probably not be the target of such regulations because I wouldn’t choose an anti-consumer phone brand anyway, but at least it’s going in the right direction.

  • Brkdncr@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is this a win? My non-Android device is at 89% health after 5 years. I’m not going to replace the battery, I’m going to replace the device.

    I’d prefer that we get paid $20 to recycle an old phone so that they actually get recycled.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Opposite boat. My perfectly good device gets replaced after about 4 years because it struggles to hold a charge. I don’t give a shit about iterative phone specs, and I say that as a tech enthusiast.

    • Nathaniel Wyvern@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Brkdncr @Roman0 Why not both?

      Easily replaceable for those who burn through capacity through heavy use. Which would also make recycling easier funny enough.

      And pushing to make recycling encouraged. These aren’t opposing ideas.

      • Otakeb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope everything just becomes brushed aluminum ffs. I hate all these glass back phones

        • wheels@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Phones only have glass backs to let wireless charging work so I don’t see aluminium making a come back any time soon.

          • Otakeb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I hate wireless charging too, though. It’s inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, I can still use my phone while it’s plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo.

  • boo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do miss being able to swap out a phone battery and this will certainly be a step in the right direction in terms ewaste and device longevity.

    One thing that I wonder about is waterproofing or water resistance. Some phones are basically waterproof in shallow water. How achievable is this with a device with a trivial way to remove the battery?

    • HubbleST@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Galaxy S5 sport had a battery door and water resistance. They just used gaskets.

    • rms1990@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      People make this argument and barely anyone really uses the waterprooding features of a phone

      • Someology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know, I really like my Essential Ph-1. It was a lovely little phone. I had the little 360 camera accessory that snapped on magentically and everything. It was so cool! Then, 1.5 seconds, dropped into water from which I grabbed it instantly, and it was done. No warranty coverage for dropping it in water, and zero waterproofing, and toasted phone. So, yes, more of us “use” waterproofing on our phones than you would think. The thing is that it didn’t need to be this way. There were waterproof phones back before everything was glued glass slabs all the time. Galaxy S5 Sport as mentioned by @HubbleST@lemm.ee above (and other “sport” edition phones). We have a lot of hygrophobic coatings and tech we didn’t have in the day of the Galaxy S5 series. We can do better now, if manufacturers are forced to.

  • balance_sheet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t this mean no waterproof then? Idk… I’m all down for right to repair but I’d rather choose struggling to remove glued battery from my phone maybe once every 2-3 years than to lose waterproof…

    • Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My old Galaxy S5 was water resistant (IP67, 30min/1 metre submerged)

      The rear cover had a gasket to prevent water entering the motherboard, micro sd, battery, sim etc.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it doesn’t. you have have IP68 and a removable battery. What’s not as easy it making them paper-thin as the battery needs to have structural integrity of its own.

    • markstos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Motorola Defy was waterproof with removable battery. A small switch locked the cover in place with a rubber gasket. This was over 10 years ago.

    • JCreazy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never understood the whole waterproof thing. I’ve never been in an instance where my phone was in any danger of getting wet. I get float trips and stuff but that seems like an uncommon case and even then there are ways to waterproof a phone temporarily.

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t use your phone on the bathroom or the kitchen? It never rains where you live? You never keep your phone in your pocket next to a sweaty leg?

        I want a phone that can survive minor issues. I don’t want a phone that will die because it slipped into the sink while washing my hands or something like that. A degree of being waterproof does that.

      • Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think a phone needs to be 100% waterproof to 50 metres, but some amount of water-resistance is just good product design. Companies should not be encouraging people to dunk their phones in water, I think IP ratings sadly encourage this as well as some of the advertising around their water resistance claims.

        But having some amount of water resistance built into electronics helps reduce e-waste because accidents do happen. For more serious water activities people should be buying waterproof bags for their electronics.