I am curious what can be done about the Lemmy.World era of botting corpo comments to protect their investments?

Anything remotely federated w/ LW has a massive hard-on for corporations (anti-piracy boot-lickers only added us back when we had the largest community in the fediverse), racism (you ain’t american, you aint right), a desire to troll/argue in bad faith, and a general “fuck you, I have 500 accounts to down-vote with.”

I myself have over 60 accounts on Lemmy.World; and because of that, I am 100% certain somebody has a type of SMM portal to scan for keywords and upvote/downvote accordingly.

Don’t believe me?

Go post about Apple, Facebook, Tesla, or any other 1% owned entity, and watch which accounts upvote/downvote in less time than required to read the post.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Y’all put the pitchforks down a bit. The lw peeps have been nothing but helpful. They did a mistake with piracy but they reverted it eventually.

    Fighting spam and astroturfing is something that affects lemmy as a whole ecosystem. Yes it’s more possible with instances which have open registrations but as a counterpoint closed registration also drive people away.

    We’re all in this together and should try to find ways to collaborate our defenses instead of attacking other admins

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Fighting spam and astroturfing is something that affects lemmy as a whole ecosystem. Yes it’s more possible with instances which have open registrations but as a counterpoint closed registration also drive people away.

      I’m in agreement towards this. The only reason Lemmy.world is so uncomfortably large is that everyone here decided to close registrations when Reddit was having the migration. sh.itjust.works was literally born because of the fact everyone else was either closing off registration entirely or requiring applications.

      Call it spam defense or whatever you want but asking people to essentially beg for an account, which is what you’re doing, don’t whitewash it, increases the barrier to entry and makes it so people don’t even want to try joining out of fear of rejection, or worse they try, don’t know they were rejected, and think Lemmy is a buggy piece of shit and leave. Maybe it makes automated spam a tiny bit harder and moderation that much lazier and laid back but those who are really commited, the astroturfers, are still going to register and write up applications filled with sweet lies to get you to hit approve, and you will hit approve because they’ll seem like normal users.

      @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com uh, don’t take any of this personally, this isn’t made to target anyone specifically, I’m just trying to point out how the behavior of other instances in the Fediverse has contributed towards world becoming so uncomfortably large (and ultimately difficult to moderate because of it).

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t think that’s quite the reason. lemmy.dbzer0.com was never closed for registrations, but added an application very soon which protected us from a lot of struggles. I Think LW got popular because it’s a very centrist instance, so people who don’t know what else, naturally flock to it. It was also one of the very first one, so it got a lot of early mover advantage, while lemmy.ml fell flat on its face becuase the admins didn’t think to upgrade their infra to something that could handle it until the migration was over.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      We’re all in this together and should try to find ways to collaborate our defenses instead of attacking other admins

      The only way this works (if I am to take their moderation at face value) would be for us to make more bot accounts than them.

      With that said, it’s already a terrible system that benefits the 1% (who is very capable of paying devs/server farms/bot nets/etc to boost their investments).

      Allowing the bots is allowing the 1% to choose the exact narrative that we see on Lemmy.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m pretty sure lw admins don’t want sock puppets and bot accounts either. They have access to ip info and other details and other users are also vigilant against it. But against dedicated actors there’s no perfect protection, no matter the countermeasures. If there’s instances which are enabling this behaviour more overtly, they tend to get defederated

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The moderation over the aforementioned accounts seems… one sided to say the least

          I (read: IMHO) would argue that they do want sock puppet/bot accounts because it boosts the perceived traffic by laymen, yeah?

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        A bot for a bot makes the Lemmyverse a bot-infested shithole.

        Do the points matter that much to you?

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          If you have a post they don’t want seen, the downvotes inherently work to remove it from all the instances that use downvotes.

          You don’t have to want up votes to see why a lemmy bot net is a bad thing.

  • willya@lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You named the three most hated brands on Lemmy. So are you saying they upvote or downvote these posts? They’re mostly downvoted with disgusting comments and insults to go with them. Along with someone calling another a tankie or some shit in a post where it has no relevance.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    ha, yeah, ive experienced this. i mean, its standard bot behavior to look for new posts and act accordingly.

    the votes should be public… are they not on lemmy? im usin mbin, where they are exposed… except downvotes are not federated here

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you have your own instance, you do get that info via federation w/ other servers. Normal users cannot see what I am suggesting, no.

      It’s been a big issues with the lemmy devs iirc (because publicity opens up the avenue for doxxing). But this also reveals that the same 50-100 accounts vote w/ their owner.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The instant voting issue can likely be handled by making honeypot posts and acting on the accounts that consistently action in <20 seconds or so.

    That said, the one thing I wish Lemmy could do is properly identify alts. There’s no system in place to combat some asshole with 1k voting power (or reporting power for the few communities with an automod like system set up) destroying the balance on a whim.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This problem also just continues to grow.

      The longer an established instance has the appearance of a large userbase, the worse it’s going to be to claw back that access now that millions of (real) accounts will decide on their echo chamber over yours…

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s so funny how the whole “Decentralization means Lemmy is better than Reddit, and no bad actors can take over” mantra keeps being tossed around. But here we are with malicious actors and no (real) solutions only more issues.

    • gullible@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Moderation federation is very spotty and always has been. I’ve cumulatively spent a few hours checking and it’s consistently inconsistent. Not to mention the fact that the referenced post was made after a user tried to make .world their personal drama blog using several accounts. This and the other post strike me as faux indignation.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think open-invite servers like that are asking for trouble. Maybe not a de-federation, but a safer space from the bot swarm I’m seeing.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lemmy.World TOS Section Labeled “Our Rights”

      6.0: You are solely and entirely responsible for your use of the website and your computer, internet, and data security.

      6.1: You waive Lemmy.World and its parent, subsidiaries, affiliates, and all their respective staff, representatives, service providers, contractors, licensors, licensees, and successors from any claims resulting from any action taken by Lemmy.World, and any of the foregoing parties relating to any investigations by either us or by law enforcement authorities.

      6.2: In the case of a violation of the Terms of Service, here is what may happen:

      6.2.0: Removal of the violating content, and asking you to not repeat it again.
      6.2.1: Being warned for the second time, and having your account temporarily suspended.
      6.2.2: Adding temporary or permanent limitations to Lemmy.World communities, such as applying NSFW tags or restricting the posting of new content by users.
      6.2.3: Removal of all content associated with the violating party.
      6.2.4: Banishing of communities.
      6.2.5: Permanent banishing of user accounts.