• freamon@endlesstalk.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      True. It might have been better though if the Lemmy devs hadn’t been such cheapskates and forked over the 10 bucks it takes to get a domain name that isn’t sketchy.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        lemmy.ml was a sort of prototype made by the devs of the lemmy software. It wasn’t really meant for widespread public adoption. So it makes sense that they went with a free domain.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The parent domain was apparently well known to be a common host of phishing domains and scam sites. Free domains tend to attract those types, so that’s a good reason from the start not to use that if you want your site to be reliably accessible and findable on search engines.

        • RxBrad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My work uses zScaler for its Internet web filters. zScaler has everything *.ml blocked.

          So yeah, it’s fairly well-known to be sketchy.

            • Quokka@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Or maybe realising anything ending in .ml was most likely spam and if it caught the 5 legitimate Mali domains oh well, zero loss for anyone.

              Kinda like how I wouldn’t download a file from a .ru site.

        • Lemdee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I did, I just messed up and didn’t tell anybody. I’m sorry folks, this is on me.

        • SlovenianSocket@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. Hosting a service in a country other than where a TLD is designated for is bad practice and common knowledge for any web developer

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty sure they went with .ml not for price reasons, but because they liked to pretend it stood for their political ideology.

        • freamon@endlesstalk.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe. I read the idea about it standing for Marxist/Leninist, but there’s thousands of TLDs now - if you can get .diamonds and .world, there’s probably something that would evoke the same lefty idea (although maybe lemmy pre-dates the new domains, I don’t know)

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            New domains have been around for a while. The fancy ones are a bit more pricey.

    • ziggurism@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Every right”? No. They have the power to do so but that doesn’t make it right. They sold those domains fair and square. Contracts were signed.