• Yulia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where then? I mean, you seem to be more confident in yourself than most biologists, so you sure know more than them and can prove why humans belong to a different category?

    • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where then?

      If you’re willing to grant me some considerable amount of money to perform relevant research and studies, I can provide a satisfactory answer.

      If you can’t, or aren’t willing to, then you need to continue to live knowing that at least one person in this world doesn’t exactly accept the model of reality you prefer.

        • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haven’t you ever seen a person whose opinions were backed by actual research, that was nevertheless wrong?

          Haven’t you ever seen a person whose opinions weren’t backed by in-depth research, who was still correct?

          • Yulia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            While it happens, there’s absolutely zero guarantee you’re one of those who are correct without research

            • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Great things were achieved with zero guarantees.

              And great many deal of people achieved nothing wasting their fortunes on 100% guaranteed deals.

              • Yulia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m asking again, why do you think your theory is more correct than current scientific consensus? Convince me as if I am an investor

                • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m asking again, why do you think your theory is more correct than current scientific consensus?

                  I don’t recall any theory being suggested here. Words do have their meanings and definitions - theory is no exception here.

                  Convince me as if I am an investor

                  You don’t struck me as trustworthy person. There are plenty of “wrongs” about your mindset. Too many to convince me that you’re talking real money.

                  Now, since all this discussion consists of you shooting blindly with flawed assumptions and me trying to get you out of binary B&W mindset, to no avail, and I grow bored of it - would that be all?