• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What’s that? Big city filled with cars, roads and useless pocket greenspaces, but with no small town community or flexibility?

    - North American city planners, circa one city construction ago.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It wasn’t just them, or the auto manufacture lobbyists that were probably more powerful at the time. There was also the influence of slightly older conspicuous consumption, so suburban lots were designed to look like mini country estates, and generally the re-emphasis of connection with the outdoors and nature that came in the midcentury. Plus, if it’s a totally new neighborhood, you can keep minorities out from the start.

        It seems designers thought people in suburbs would, like, be close friends with everyone on the cul-de-sac, and they’d spend all weekend chilling outdoors and having barbecues. Maybe make one giant croquet course all down the street. Instead, you barely know your immediate neighbor’s names, and anyone two doors down is under suspicion of being a violent criminal.

        To be fair, they aren’t the first or last designers to fundamentally misunderstand how the public will interact with the infrastructure; that’s still a source of surprises today. I just wish we had changed course as soon as the truth became clear.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I thought we were talking about inner city planning, but yeah, suburbs are the flip side to the same coin.