• QHC@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The number of people in this post that don’t understand the difference between a private company’s HR/PR decisions and the actual legal system is shocking.

    • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No one said they couldn’t fire roiland because it violates laws. They said he shouldn’t have been fired because of the concept of innocent until proven guilty. That’s separate from the law.

      But the text messages to minors should be enough for anyone to want him fired.

      • QHC@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are you talking about? “Innocent until proven guilty” is only relevant from the perspective of the law.

        • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The law isn’t the beginning and end of thought. The law was made because of the principle. It’s not fully encompassing of the principle.