I totally agree with him. This will bring more people to the fediverse once they realize they can interact with their friends on Threads

  • PropaGandalf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    You can hardly kill a decentralized network. Even if we fall back to field 1. People who actively chose freedom will stay.

    • tobbue@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can: by making it irrelevant. It’s not dead then, but not used also. And that is what’s planned here.

      • Dame @lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s already irrelevant, it’s never been. The Fediverse is well over a decade old and most people don’t know it exists.

        • Christian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s irrelevant to you, but a community doesn’t have to be massive for it to be important to it’s users, it just has to be big enough for people to get something out of it regularly to keep the existing userbase engaged. Lemmy pre-migration is a great example. But if enough people leave in a short timespan it’s really hard to keep the remaining userbase engaged after that drop-off. XMPP is a good example of this actually happening, I had a bunch of friends on there for years. When google pulled the rug, a lot of users lost a lot of their reasons for sticking around. It’s a shell of itself now.

          • Dame @lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            XMPP was largely irrelevant before Google and went back to being that way after Google and a bunch of newer tech. It wasn’t directly connected to Google. Nothing outside of someone’s blog would even indicate that. I didn’t say it’s irrelevant to me. To me is not important. Globally and in terms of social media it is in fact irrelevant. Not even sure why you said irrelevant to me that doesn’t even match the context