• 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’d focus on enforcing standards and interoperability first, in a serious an highly punitive fashion for offenders.

    If you can read/write your spreadsheet using any spreadsheet tool or OS you’re half-way there and will’ve severely hampered the old embrace-extend-extinguish (it’s still a thing).

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Unfortunately the ISO certification process for office document formats was subverted by Microsoft to require their OOXML formats instead of the ODF (Open Document Format) that was being prepared for this role. And then they continued by not implementing the certified format correctly in Office anyway.

      As a result it’s virtually impossible for any law-abiding, taxpayer-answering government to argue for adopting ODF over OOXML

      It’s also impossible to find any other software that supports existing documents, because Microsoft introduces differences from the spec on purpose and any software that tries to stick to the official OOXML format can’t process them 100% correctly.

      Any government that wants to wean itself off Microsoft documents would have to first conduct an investigation, explain why ODF is the better format, demonstrate that Microsoft doesn’t follow their own spec, then accept the fact they’re gonna partially lose their existing documents if they move away, and only then they’d be able to start the process of looking for ODF-supporting software and companies, and convert their docs and processes.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        demonstrate that Microsoft doesn’t follow their own spec

        I genuinely feel bad for MS devs because of all of the garbage that they have to deal with because of scummy management and the Balmer years.