Not sure what others are doing to use Ubuntu (23.04) without snaps, but this is what I am doing:

  • for Firefox I found a guide here
  • for chromium I am actually using the Linux Mint packages (which work absolutely fine), and I have just set up a small repository I can add to apt:
deb [arch=amd64 allow-insecure=yes] http://snapless.cmeerw.net victoria upstream
  • this just syncs from Linux Mint and only republishes chromium in the Packages file (with downloads redirected to a Linux Mint mirror). BTW, I am not signing these…

What are others doing?

    • DeuxChevaux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I switched two of our boxes over to Debian “Bookworm”. And so far, I am completely happy with the change. On desktop, it’s still a little rough around the edges, and a few oddities need to be ironed out here and there, but that’s nothing compared with the ocean of pain that were snaps for me and my company.

      Still a little nostalgic, though, after 17 years of Ubuntu 🫠

        • cmeerw@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is only having an LTS version vs. having a choice between using an LTS version or a non-LTS version not a downside?

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The LTS versions are more stable, so why bother with non-LTS versions? If you want faster updates, you probably want a rolling release like Arch or openSUSE Tumbleweed.

          • DryTomatoes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve used a lot of Ubuntu over the years starting on 9.04. Let me tell you the six months releases are ass and always have been.

            Also I’m switching to Debian.

      • vojel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        True but it depends on your usecase- of you need all the fancy new stuff and want to move on quickly you should go another route instead of fucking around with forced software you do not want. Maybe Debian testing or Fedora? If you do not care about the newest stuff I guess Mint is a perfect fit.

    • packetloss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      This.

      I just went from Arch to Debian 12 Bookworm. Running the stable branch, but so far most of the packages are rather recent. Kernel is 6.1 instead of 6.4, but I could switch to the Testing or Unstable branch to get the “bleeding edge” packages/kernels if I need to. But honestly so far it’s been a real pleasure to use. Everything is just working and is stable.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Debian 12 was just released. Compare it to Arch even six months from now and see how current the packages are. Then compare it again in 18 months.

        I am a happy Arch user but I must admit the constant kernel updates can seem a bit much. An experiment I have considered is moving to Debian 12 and using distrobox to get access to Arch repos and the AUR. I would use the Debian stuff as much as possible but for anything missing or anything that I really need to be more current, I could just fall back to the Arch repos.

        It could be the best of both worlds.

        • oldGregg@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s exactly what I just set up.

          I went in thinking as long as dockerband virtual machines work I’m good. They both worked no problems, set up distrobox, tried pamac which opened but installing packages through it was fucky. Yay works great though.

          The only thing I’m not sure about is running a VPN through distrobox, but that’s next on the list. I can always switch vpns to a Debian friendly one if it has problems.

        • RogerWilco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          FYI Arch offers linux-lts. You can install that and linux-lts-headers and switch grub/whatever your boot loader is to default to that and forget about running the bleeding edge kernel. Linux 6.4.x has been literal dog shit with several ugly amdgpu bugs and suspend is randomly borked about 1/3 of the times I try to suspend my PC for the evening (and issue I’m not experiencing alone).

          So, yeah. Give the linux-lts linux-lts-headers packages a try. You get the benefits Arch’s cutting-edge packages on a stable kernel.

      • Yote.zip@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I switched from Arch to Debian Stable as well. I grabbed the Xanmod kernel repo for a more recent kernel, and use Flatpaks and Homebrew for some cutting edge stuff. I don’t miss anything from Arch so far.

        • PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          don’t miss anything from Arch so far.

          same I switched to debian testing. best experience. never had issues since a year. Arch usually borked once in this period.

  • nottheengineer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My solution is using a distro that doesn’t try to force snaps on me.

    If you want the ubuntu base, why not use mint?

    • cmeerw@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mint would be based on Ubuntu 22.04, but I’d like to have something more up-to-date. I believe all other .deb based distros have the same issue that they are not as up-to-date as Ubuntu 23.04?

      • nottheengineer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        None of them are like arch where you can read news about an update and find that you just have it installed already.

        Given you’re on ubuntu and therefore not at the bleeding edge anyways, it won’t be a big difference. My personal choice for stuff that just needs to work is debian. I carry debian LTS with the full KDE pack on my ventoy and it’s been great. I also heard very good things about testing and Sid, but I haven’t tried them myself.

    • cmeerw@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am using a single package from Mint, the rest is Ubuntu 23.04. Mint would otherwise be based on Ubuntu 22.04?

      • db2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, Mint 21.x is based on Jammy.

        Unless you get LMDE which goes back even more to be based on Debian directly.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Feels like you don’t want to use Ubuntu.

    Ubuntu is going the way of snap-only and it might as well pick an Ubuntu-based GNOME distro. There’s a bunch out there, but PopOS can be pretty easily stripped down to a vanilla GNOME system. You could even just modify Mint and install GNOME on top of that.

    How about VanillaOS? That’s an Ubuntu (soon to be debian) based plain GNOME system with support for a range of packaging formats.

    You could also go for Manjaro GNOME edition, but not as stable.

    Zorin is cool but not as barebones for a GNOME spin.

        • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yeah, for sure. I was just throwing out some other ones to check out if they had a different preference on DE or just wanted to check out something different from GNOME. Just adding on to the options!

    • cmeerw@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but what about your chromium builds? (as mentioned in my post, replacing the firefox snap with a firefox deb is easy enough on Ubuntu, chromium is the more difficult one to deal with)

      • Michael Murphy (S76)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Chromium is better served through third parties like Vivaldi. Or by Chrome from Google. Most of which offer debs. We recommend Firefox though.

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Switched to Linux Mint. But not because of Snaps but rather RAM usage. Mint is lighter and faster. On cold boot it uses just 745mb versus 1.6GB on Ubuntu Gnome.

    I don’t mind Snaps but I also won’t go out of my way to install it because there is no must-have snap that I need.

    • shiroininja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love mint. I use it everywhere. You wouldn’t recognize it anywhere I use it though. I customize the hell out of it. Right now I got this retro Ubuntu thing going on, running Unity DE and no snaps. not that I’m wholly against them, I just don’t have them.

  • s20@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I were going to do snapless Ubuntu, I’d probably just install Mint. It seems a lot easier.

    Of course, since I use Fedora I don’t have to worry about any of that nonsense. I gave up on Ubuntu years ago.

  • RiotRick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can just download the firefox tarball from their own site. And that will just update itself.

  • manpacket@lemmyrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Moving to a different distro :) Experimenting with nixos right now, already got native Firefox working :)

  • Papamousse@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My solution is to use MX, based on Debian. All packages came as .deb so a simple sudo apt install firefox is working.