• XIIIesq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Imagine criticising someone for using a word despite it having been in the vernacular for years.

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Vernacular doesn’t need to belong to a person or even a group of people.

        If your problem is with the people who say it and not the word itself, that’s a different issue and one that I’m not really interested in debating.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Vernacular doesn’t need to belong to a person or even a group of people.

          Then why do they call it “African American Vernacular English”?

          If your problem is with the people who say it and not the word itself, that’s a different issue and one that I’m not really interested in debating.

          Who says I can’t have two problems?

          • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Is English your second language? I didn’t say it can’t be associated to a person or group, I said it doesn’t need to.

            I also didn’t say that you can’t have more than one problem, I just addressed the one you seemed to be concerned with and defined it as one that I’m not interested in debating.