• FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    They seem to be getting a pass on using copyrighted materials to feed these programs so I am doubting that we would get legislation protecting our own likenesses, or those of our loved ones. I bet you couldn’t even get lawmakers to understand what they would need to write into law. They (american lawmakers) all seem to be so up to speed on technology. /s

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not until someone starts making clips of lawmakers narrating their own crimes and unethical behavior, then they’ll get it done immediately.

      Not that I’m suggesting anyone do that…

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How the fuck does someone go from “I want to punish this person” to “lets make porn of a woman in his life who has nothing to do with it, that’ll show 'em!”??

          Surely there are a million ways you can come up with to include whichever lawmaker in a deepfake that don’t include violating an unrelated woman?

          • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because that’s a news story I have already read about. This has happened to people. No need to be so sanctimonious.