• Serdan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see the difference between doing this with AI or doing it with Photoshop. It’s horrible independently of the tools used.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cool, so you see no problem with these ghouls being even more efficient with AI because governments have zero fucking clue about new technology?

        Are you too stupid to understand why that is a horrible thing?

        • Serdan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think there should be legal avenues to shut down people who do that shit.

          It doesn’t matter what tools they’re using. The solution is the same regardless.

          • These people are using likeliness of actual people without their (or their heirs’/parents’ in case of dead people) permission to make money off of tragedies. I don’t know about you, but I think we as a society should have laws from preventing this from happening.

        • src@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you would support government limiting an individual’s right to run software on their computer because you don’t agree with what the software outputs?

          That’s absolute nonsense. The entire premise of these machine learning models is that they accept any arbitrary input, you would want to neuter that?

            • src@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So it’s acceptable for AIs to generate these sorts of outputs, as long as they aren’t shared online? Sure, the outputs aren’t very tasteful, but they’re certainly not illegal by any stretch.

              Why do you think the government should intervene, and what you would even expect them to do? No laws are being broken.

              If you somehow forbid AIs from generating this through a national law just because it’s offensive, it’ll open to floodgates to ban 1,000 other things that are offensive. Where do you draw the line? Ban this content from websites like TikTok, sure. But it doesn’t make sense to regulate this from the AIs themselves.