• Addv4@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If in the upper atmosphere yes, but I doubt any of the sulfer from these gets anywhere near that height, and actually just falls back down to pollute down here.

    • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s actually been theorized that ships using cleaner fuel (read: less sulfur output) contributed to the peak temperatures of the atlantik ocean

      • JungleJim@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thankfully we already have non-sulfur cloud seeding technology so now that we know the oceanic clouds made it cooler we can make more clouds without sulfur, netting us the heat shield without the pollution.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, the link seems to be real. Very recent studies based on satellite data have detected a reduction in cloud reflectivity caused by the reduction in sulfur emissions. This will accelerate global warming; by exactly how much is currently not known.