• Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Allright you’re just going in circles, it’s obvious you refuse to engage with anything I put in front of you, and you keep behaving as if I haven’t gone into every single one of your arguments. You’re wasting both of our times by willfully choosing to be obtuse, so I am going to disengage from this conversation

    • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you not ask for more sources and did I not give a few more? Did I not ask what criteria you want us to go by with sources and did you not say there was no inherent criteria except to demonstrate where points in an article conflict? If in your answer to that question you were explaining your chosen criteria, you have a funny way of showing it.

      • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’ve given exactly one more, which I engaged with. Stop being obtuse.
        I’ve given you the criteria. You kept asking for the criteria, yet you had received it.

        • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Alright, if that’s the criteria (even though it can be perceived as a lack thereof), then there’s really nothing you’re going by or can go by based on your sources because they’re all even in that regard.

          I’ll give an example in one of them. One of your sources claims that North Korea allows people in like any other nation as long as it’s not one of their three opponents… yet the sources also allude to the fact it’s barricaded, with a river to the North and a guarded wall to the South.