• Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not saying that, I’ve taken the time to go thru them and illustrate why they are bad sources for backing up your claim.

    There are a few you’ve yet to say anything about. The rest of them you’ve basically said it boils down to the trustworthiness of the country it’s in (or in Wikipedia’s case the supposed Godwin’s-law-violating bias) but then when it’s asked what the trustworthiness itself boils down to and it becomes a subjective matter.

    Now all you need to do is engage with the content and critique it…

    Haven’t I?

    …based on a factual basis.

    Your true colors are showing. Imagine if this was a court of law. You’d be seen as imperial for not having anymore evidence than the opposing side yet insisting it amounts to more than the opposing side.

    I stopped appealing to authority in the first few comments, then I became ready to adapt to what you wish I appeal to, because based on the lack of clarity about your answer aside from your view on how a source should be critiqued, your stance is not as above mine in being backed up as you make it sound like you believe.