An artist who infamously duped an art contest with an AI image is suing the U.S. Copyright Office over its refusal to register the image’s copyright.

In the lawsuit, Jason M. Allen asks a Colorado federal court to reverse the Copyright Office’s decision on his artwork Theatre D’opera Spatialbecause it was an expression of his creativity.

Reuters says the Copyright Office refused to comment on the case while Allen in a statement complains that the office’s decision “put me in a terrible position, with no recourse against others who are blatantly and repeatedly stealing my work.”

  • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    It has to be fixed in a tangible medium.

    Hard disks are pretty tangible.

    But if they are not as you suggest, does this mean all digital photography is not copyright able?

    So many arguments as to why this shouldn’t be subject to copyright seem to fail simple questions of logic.

    If the output of ML isn’t copyright able, then the inputs should not be subject to copyright either. The whole system is broken and only serves to enrich the few at the expense of the many. It doesn’t protect the small time artists, only the exceptionally wealthy ones who earn more than the typical worker will make in many lifetimes.

    • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Here’s more if you’d like to read about it.

      https://www.copyright.gov/engage/visual-artists/

      I remember when the DMCA was introduced and all the various issues arising from what and isn’t copyrightable when it comes to digital vs physical copies, etc.

      Again I’d like to recommend Leonard French (Lawful Masse) on YouTube and Twitch for a copyright lawyers breakdown of these kinds of issues.