“When you use Signal, your data is stored in encrypted form on your devices. The only information that is stored on the Signal servers for each account is the phone number you registered with, the date and time you joined the service, and the date you last logged on.”

This isn’t an ad, I wasn’t paid for this post. Just to clear the air: fuck facebook, fuck elon musk and twitter, fuck anyone who thinks this is a paid advertisement. I wish I was paid for this shit, I just wanted to spread the word. Thank you. 😀 👍

  • redballooon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I sometimes wonder who’s paying to run the servers, and where that money originates.

    • GingerKun@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It kind of doesn’t matter… That’s the beauty of fully auditable open source end to end encryption.

      • redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They know the same things about me as WhatsApp. They have all contacts and all metadata. Why do you say it doesn’t matter?

        • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There isn’t any audit on whatsapp’s side. So you are trusting they are running the code they tell you they run on their servers.

          So it’s not just about metadata, I wouldn’t trust facebook not to have some kind of access to the content of the messages. Which is much worse.

          Also, Whatsapp is Facebook right ? Not really an amazing track record when it comes to privacy. They said they implemented the Signal protocol but you still have to trust them to be doing so.

          I think that’s what the person you are responding to was essentially saying, we do not know for sure what Whatsapp does.

          • redballooon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well now you are really insinuating a conspiracy inside Facebook. That may be happening and that would be bad.

            But I’m not talking about anything like that. I’m really only focusing on what Facebook openly says what WhatsApp is doing, and monetizing. And that’s exactly about the same data that we give Signal under the flag of open source and freedom. There’s no difference, except that in the case of WhatsApp I know the business model, and for signal I don’t.

            I don’t pay for Signal servers, so who does?

      • redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No offense, but both style and factual claims that article shout conspiracy theory.

        I can’t take this piece of writing as a serious source.

        • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe, but I find it more likely to be true than false. My overarching takeaway is that if you actually care about the secrecy of a communication, don’t use signal, use gpg.