• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Question: why aren’t the sort of nuclear power generators we seem to have no problem strapping on to rockets and shooting into space for our probes scalable for larger projects?

    i.e. with the Cassini Probe?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        But it generates electricity, right? So couldn’t we scale it up? I admit this is way out of my sphere of knowledge, which is why I’m asking.

        • Mayor Poopington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m no expert but did some quick googling. Seems they are very expensive and don’t produce much power, making them useful only for nich situations.

        • tal@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I haven’t looked at the numbers, but I expext that while RTGs are simple and reliable, that they aren’t cost-competitive with nuclear reactors per unit of energy generated.

          From memory, we have actually used them on Earth in a few situations where we need a very long-lasting, albeit very limited in quantity, source of power, like remote, unmanned lighthouses that aren’t connected to anything.

          Also, I don’t believe that, at least with the ones I’ve read about, one can control their power output. It’s just a container of some material that’s got enough passive radioactivity to stay warm enough to generate some electricity.