Under the new restrictions, short-term renters will need to register with the city and must be present in the home for the duration of the rental

Home-sharing company Airbnb said it had to stop accepting some reservations in New York City after new regulations on short-term rentals went into effect.

The new rules are intended to effectively end a free-for-all in which landlords and residents have been renting out their apartments by the week or the night to tourists or others in the city for short stays. Advocates say the practice has driven a rise in demand for housing in already scarce neighbourhoods in the city.

Under the new system, rentals shorter than 30 days are only allowed if hosts register with the city. Hosts must also commit to being physically present in the home for the duration of the rental, sharing living quarters with their guest. More than two guests at a time are not allowed, either, meaning families are effectively barred.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find it so weird that your take is “only the wealthy deserve a home, period.” Like that’s such a hellish thing to say.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What a cockamamie take! We’re not kicking these people out of their homes by forcing them to follow simple rules to ensure they don’t burn families of random strangers in a raging inferno. They’re still free to…y’know…have and live in their home.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          By your exact same logic, if someone is making and selling meth out of their home in order to make supplemental income and bridge payment gaps, then by telling them to stop we’re effectively telling them “only the wealthy deserve a home, period.”

          Meth dealer: "But I can't afford my home without it!"
          
          Me: "Um, tough shit.  Stop it."
          

          Is “people can’t afford to live” your “get out of jail free” card?

          • merridew@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think that’s an ideal analogy. No-one sells meth legally.

            It’s more like selling people food prepared in your uninspected and potentially unsanitary kitchen, and complaining about being told to comply with the food hygiene regulations that every licensed business is required to adhere to.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is when the decision being made negatively impacts housing availability.

            Lots of people on this site are radicals in one way or another and my radicalization is zoning policy and the housing market disruption is has caused.

            • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So people should be able to do whatever they want as long as it helps them pay rent, because them making rental payments ipso facto impacts housing availability?

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No, because it turns out there is a whole spectrum of regulation that is possible, and some regulations are more oppressive than others.

                Same basic principle as hair stylists in the US needing more schooling than police, by law, which is similarly insane.

                • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well given that AirBnB availability inflates property values (2, 3, 4), increases rental rates (2), and decreases the availability of long-term rental units (2), I’m comfortable with big cities severely curtailing them in order to improve housing affordability and reduce pressure on low income renters. Whether they will couple that restriction with zoning relaxations that increase homebuilding and density is another matter altogether and something for them to discuss in the future.

                • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Should a hair stylist require schooling and training? Yes, they put caustic chemicals on people’s heads which can cause sever harm.

                  Should police have more training? Yes.

                  This isn’t a good argument because the lack of police training has no bearing on the licensing and training of hair stylists.

                  Here’s the take you are trying to get people to say, if you cannot afford to own a home without supplementing income by provided room rentals which are potentially unsafe and do not meet the bare minimum of fire code, then you cannot afford that house. It doesn’t mean you don’t afford a house. Just that you cannot afford THAT house. And I make no mention of “deserve housing” because all humans deserve housing.

                  Putting people’s lives at risk to make a few extra dollars is unacceptable. You have no right to gamble with other people’s lives.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Except people’s lives aren’t at risk because it’s not like we’ve seen a rush of AirBnB deaths that caused this shift.

    • merridew@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find this viewpoint fascinating. Like arguing that trying to put out a burning building will hurt poor people trying to keep warm.

      The housing market as a whole is the problem, one which AirBnB is exacerbating. That it locally enriches those renters able to find people willing to rent out their homes – which I’m guessing is disproportionately going to be people without elderly family members & kids – doesn’t mean it isn’t detrimental to the housing market as a whole, particularly at the lower end, and to everyone who rents.