![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Erm, sorry, but I fail to see the news here? It’s a nice information about neuschwanstein, but what exactly happened now?
Erm, sorry, but I fail to see the news here? It’s a nice information about neuschwanstein, but what exactly happened now?
Shopping, especially when walking to the supermarket.
Going for a walk in general, actually.
That’s actually just a basic skill in Germany and far from impressive. Even myself who basically can do nothing with his hands can open a beer bottle with many objects that have an edge.
Not saying that it might not be impressive in other parts of the world, but dont overestimate its effect in Germany. ;)
Edit: Just remembered that I knew a guy who opened bottles with his eye socket…crazy shit.
I really have trouble comprehending your comment. Do you mean that any criticism is unjustified?
What? Of course the newly exposed skin will be more sensitive as compared to before…for some time. We are talking about years and probably at least a decade after the circumcision took place, until it gets relevant for the affected person for sexual reasons. Until then the (probably even higher than before) sensitivity will have dropped. Sensors in the skin will be cut down by the body in order to prevent irritations when they have to fire all the time, which is true for the glans that is not protected anymore, is irritated all the time (underwear) and does not have the same capability to produce callus as the hands or feet.
The principle should not be foreign to you as principally the same happens by producing callus. The body produces it to stop irritation and to prevent long-lasting negative effects.
The bones in your upper legs are one of those (together with your hips) that have a persisting high bone marrow density, which produces a high amount of white blood cells during infection. This means that the bone marrow is populated by a much higher number of cells, which creates “pressure”.
Great display of standing up against false “anti-semitic” claims, when criticizing the politics of Israel.
The article unfortunately does not state who won…does anyone know? The BBC basketball section obviously doesn’t, at least I couldn’t find it there.Edit: The article actually states the result. Israel won 87-57. :/