diprount_tomato

Alr

How TF do you “simulate a sex act on someone”?

Oh no, not Mr Hands

Puerto Rico is a literal colony. Not the best example

Well, I’d say it’s just their straightforwardness and their “showmanlike” attitude

Far-right is when I don’t like, idiot

Not one to refer to an individual, that’s for sure

What a shit take (read it in a Peter Griffin voice)

First, that’s not the Bible. Second, “we” is not “gender-neutral”, it’s just the standard 1st person plural

Legal documents (what the article is about) must be uniform, exactly the opposite to “custom pronouns”

So, no problem unless you talk about it?

I’d use “they/them” pronouns if I’m asked to out of respect to another human being, but that won’t make me stop thinking that usage is bs

It’s still not used for the same grammatical reasons

First one talks about mothers in general, second one refers to being a friend of someone

Because they’re totally different uses of gender-neutral language

First one is plural, second one is refering to what I said in my previous comment

Definitely not my problem, but yours

No, priests taking up female roles aren’t trans or non-binary

Well, that’s because you don’t know or don’t care about the gender of the applicant, not because that applicant is non-binary

Aren’t those cases referring to individuals you don’t know the gender of? Like “I saw a silhouette moving, they were going somewhere”