That’s what I’m asking. What are you talking about?

Screaming? I thought I was typing…

as if somehow the popular vote has ever won a presidency

Uhh, that’s exactly how it works per state. The most popular vote in that state gets the electoral votes for that state.

Is it really that hard to conceptualize 90,000 > 550? Or that green party voters back then were much closer to democratic voters than republican? You have to ignore the most obvious fact in order to contrive others.

I mean if you’re ignoring the context of the election and 2000, then maybe you can make that leap.

I did read the link. And it still seems like a ton of mental gymnastics to ignore the vote totals.

Lol, no. Why would you even think that?

I don’t understand that conclusion. According to their table there, Gore lost by ~550 votes and Nader had over 90,000 votes. Do you really think those votes would have been evenly split?

Apparently a lot of people were thinking the same way you were if judged by the votes.

Chill? I’m not heated. Clearly it was a misunderstanding, that’s why I explained it. I didn’t mean any disrespect.

No… Because I’m only referring to one post.

He’s wrong anyway, the green party isn’t a threat to any of the parties, but it’s designed to shape off 1-3% off the democratic vote to help republicans.

I’ll break it down for you. The first part of the post literally says this:

the green party isn’t a threat to any of the parties

And then the very next part of the same sentence is:

but it’s designed to shape off 1-3% off the democratic vote to help republicans

Which is exactly what I pointed out. It starts by saying the green party isn’t a threat and then gives the exact reason why it is a threat.

Are you saying that something helping the republicans isn’t a threat to democrats? Or are you saying it’s not enough to help because you’ve already forgotten the lesson from 2000?

Tell that to Al Gore.

No, that commenter literally said they’re not a threat and then gave the exact reason the green party is a threat to democrats.

You said it’s not a threat and then gave a reason it is actually a threat.

Also, being a fascist seems to really lead to violence.

Good thing they ended up doing the sensible thing.

If you have Android, you should check out Shelter or Island (Shelter is open source, but Island is in the play store). It’s not what you’re describing, but it accomplishes something similar. It essentially leverages Androids ability to create a work profile to create another isolated profile on your phone. That profile can have spoofed, useless data fed to it or even just be disabled when you’re not using it.

Trump said he would create a government position just for him. He would also probably get some easier contracts and less oversight with SpaceX.

From my understanding California already had the red tape and funding figured out for it too. But they paused it because they wanted to look into the vaporware loop.

Apple dragged their feet for years in implementing RCS.