😂😂😂

Removed by mod

😂

Name calling. And all of the sudden you’re right! But hey, you forgot “bigot” from your answer, we all know you’re not truly right until you call me a bigot!

Unfortunately, you don’t understand the basics of living in a society. Please stop being arrogant and don’t assume you have an opinion worth listening to.

Hey, you cannot say that here! It doesn’t fit the general narrative. What are you thinking? /s

I cannot believe it, this coming from the man who knows more about production and manufacturing than anyone alive! For sure the Genius of Musk will find a solution to overcome this.

Like when he demanded 10um tolerance for the assembly of the cybershmuck nobody understood and they said it’s impossible. But he realised, he realised early on that the mail will leak and idiots will take it as an argument of quality and performance and be motivated to throw money at him. Conmen need money inflow to keep the scheme going.

/s or not …

Damn, I feel old! :)

“They said it’s not necessarily my fault but it’s not Tesla’s to pay under warranty.”

If it’s not a warranty case and not a misuse case that means it’s designed and it’s supposed to function like that. Imagine an “automotive” grade battery pack with a lower IP rating that the car itself :))))

Unfortunately for work I have to use Windows.

“Windows 11 is simply OK. There’s nothing particularly wrong with it except for its hardware requirements.”

Wtf? It’s just ok? It’s a resource hog, excelling at one thing: spyware implementation.

Have you seen the new Taskbar? It has the functionality of a wooden stick. They even had to make a damn patch to put the “Start Task Manager” option back in the context menu! They fucked up the menus and now everything is just “several hundred clicks away”.

And their constant push for subscription based shit is just annoying like hell.

L.E. typo

Thank you, I was searching for something like this.

Are there people still naive enough to believe this conman?

Black belt level bullshido!

Thank you for your reply. It’s simple:

• if they have Australian citizenship (I think in 67 was a push for this) then they already have all the Constitutional rights and obligations like every other Australian citizen. Why are these extra steps necessary?

• if they don’t: what is their current legal status? Why not just give them citizenship and thus having the right of representation in the Parliament and so forth?

Ok, thank you for your patience.

But aren’t Aboriginal people citizens of Australia and so already part of the Constitution thus having legal rights like everyone else? What are the extra rights and representation needed?

New to the subject here: why is it a desirable thing to recognise Aboriginal people in the Constitution?

As I read through the article in the Aboriginal camp not everyone wants this. So I’m puzzled.

Ok, then maybe I’m at fault and I didn’t understand what you were trying to say.

Ohhhh, we’re discussing hypotheticals, sorry I thought you were serious.

Because then for sure you would have taken in consideration that religious affiliation, nationality and branding are pretty different things. The level of psychological involvement and the way these elements interact and define ones individual structure is quite incomparable. Usually for religious people (especially fundamenlists) religion does define their personal values, morality an so on. This IS the purpose of religion after all.

And then of course you would have taken in consideration that this is a conflict with mainly a religious conflict. Although you can say palestinians fight mainly for their land the other Muslim countries that support them have also religious motives.

And of course it’s a fact that they didn’t choose to take another religious affiliation or as you say a different brand.

But they don’t, so you argument is invalid.