I’m not sure about that one too be honest, I imagine over time there’s probably a different mechanism for it but I’m not familiar enough to say.
I’m not sure about that one too be honest, I imagine over time there’s probably a different mechanism for it but I’m not familiar enough to say.
Well they are, Gram positive bacteria can be oxidative or fermentive and wine has both in the same solution working together to make wine go bad in the presence of oxygen.
The answer was accurate and simple, why it was necessary to get so deep into the weeds I do not know.
You have to read the sources sources boss.
Wine both oxidizes and ferments and both processes play off each other.
The question was how is it not bad/vinegar the answer to both is a reduced oxygen environment.
The source provided, I didn’t read username.
It does both as it says in your source boss.
Buddy…
that sometimes develops on fermenting alcoholic liquids during the process that turns alcohol into acetic acid *with the help of oxygen from the air and acetic acid bacteria (AAB). It
When it oxidizes yes iirc. No or ultra low oxygen content means that process is greatly delayed.
You actually did when you claimed 6 unknown persons were bots without evidence or even their names. Ie. “I don’t know them but they’re bots because they have the opposite opinion I do”
I never said bots don’t exist, I said you can’t in an evidence* vacuum just say someone is a bot and try to end the argument with that.
Saying you’re acting stupid and calling you stupid are two separate things. I don’t think you’re stupid, I think you act stupidly but I do enjoy the multiple reports to the mod team so they remove my posts, fun way to “win” an argument.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
You’ve the time to reply, why not make the point instead of running away.
You trash talk bud, not me.
Sure, aside from talking shit and not backing it up, calling people bots with zero reasoning, and a blanket stance that anyone who disagrees with your stance is a bot.
Sounds a lot like something a bot stuck in a corner might say.
Arguably it’s networking though it bears a fun similarity to the right losing its shit over bidens son getting a job he probably didn’t deserve like every other rich kid on the planet.
Who? Where?
Sure that was a thing to some* extent. Where is your evidence the people you disagree with here and now are bots.
Removed by mod
My boss was talking about wanting them all investigated for sex crimes. Just like… How is that a good use of tax money? More funny is the fact that he doesn’t believe taxation should be a thing…
No bad. You don’t need soldiers to attack you need them to deny area. No soldiers ≠ no war/conflict.
Legally … but the law doesn’t apply to the president so long as they’re doing it for a reason they believe to be official.