![](https://media.kbin.social/media/a8/91/a891790864d4f3fc56ef28e4a12b98c56e096ff2b719c95a7f36b3dfc8046298.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/fed50129-04e7-4dbc-8f54-4ba5bae58370.png)
They either have a Star Trek license and can’t say so yet, or they are going to be sued into oblivion.
They either have a Star Trek license and can’t say so yet, or they are going to be sued into oblivion.
If you write it down and sell it you 100% do violate copyright
We have per weight pricing on a lot of items in The Netherlands. It’s great for comparing different items when you’re in the supermarket, but doesn’t really work against shrinkification. You simply don’t remember the price-per-kg from last week.
Me too. I will not spend a single cent on Epic, but I’ll happily buy Steam games.
They can still seize it, and hand out fines for the attempt to hide it too!
/me furiously taking notes
43 years old here. I can still hear it. I think I put about 10-15 chargers in the bin because of the noise. I also really hate those anti-mosquito ultrasone emittors people put in their yards. I can hear them whenever I walk around the neighborhood.
Too bad about the horrible Monster Energy product placement. It totally ruined the game for me.
RMS doesn’t disagree with OSI about the open source definition. He just thinks his Free Software definition is better. But RMS would most certainly not call “source available” software “open source”
It’s the same thing. AI is not some magic pixie dust.
Because the OSI has been defining and stewarding open source for 25 years. It is the de facto definition and has been recognised as such by multiple governments around the world. Anyone trying to muddy the waters is probably trying to sell you their “source available” software as open source.
Most organisations and individuals that disagree with their definition are trying to sell you source available software as open source.
If it’s not OSI approved then it’s not open source. I hate it when companies try to dilute the open source moniker. This is “source available”
I think that vulnerability was a non-issue. Someone could get to your password if they had full access to your machine to run arbitrairy code. But if someone has that much access, it’s already game over.
But yeah, Bitwarden is better IMHO
On the flip side, no dev worth their salt was going to trust Unity with him still as CEO.
Because we kicked most of the repressed puritan religious nutjobs out of Europe during the enlightenment.
It may not be your cup of tea, but a lot of people (me included) really like SoT.