@emperor@feddit.uk - is this a me problem or a feddit.uk problem?
@emperor@feddit.uk - is this a me problem or a feddit.uk problem?
Oh no way - awesome and thank you.
Edit: still won’t work for me. Are we sure it’s not a user error on my end or is this really the right way to fetch a remote instance?
Absolute fucking hero.
I hate how awkward it always seems to be trying to fetch a remote community.
What am I doing wrong?
Me and my wife… Got really bored. The gameplay loop is supppperr trivial, and even though they add in stuff every now and again, eh…
I dunno, it’s okay - but I just don’t get the hype. I wanted to pitch in because if someone is considering buying it I’d really recommend checking a Let’s Play of it before trying it.
It felt like a game specifically designed for a gamer to introduce gaming to their never-gamed-before partner. If you’re both experienced gamers like we are, I wonder whether you’d give up on it too.
TIL thanks.
What’s the difference?
Oh no!
Anyway…
Corbyn was absolutely shit smeared by the press; if you get people to look at Corbyn’s Labour policies in isolation, I reckon you’d be hard pressed to find someone that disliked them.
I wonder why privately held media would do this…
Was he not very popular in his constituency though?
Pugilistic - TIL a new word!
No worries. What I’d give to shoot the person that came up with the FPTP voting system…
I feel like you took my comment to be a critique of the EU’s position, which is not what I was trying to say at all.
I presume that such an agreement would be in the EUs interest - hence the expression of such. Public clarification at this stage of the ‘cost’- as you put it - is a great way to take it off the official policy booklet. Which doesn’t make sense to me.
I am aware that UK politics is stupid. I live here.
If the move would be of interest to the EU, then unless they are completely politically inept, can these officials not see how saying it would require ECJ oversight before an election risks it being eliminated from Labour policy?
It gives a free attack point for the Tories and couldn’t be a bigger face palm - for anyone actually interested in it, of course.
Anyone that expected the current British government to do anything a government is meant to do… Well… Let me introduce you to the past 14 years of disappointment.
The trouble is the upfront capital though, but at the same time another publisher would surely bite at the thought of getting a talented studio’s staff in one go?
I mean, yeah… There’s no such thing as being an ethical billionaire.
If reviews don’t flip back to positive in response (seeing as they only went negative in anticipation of this policy being enforced), then we have no way of indicating our dissatisfaction next time Sony do something undesirable.
Let’s compare it with adult pornography. Does the consumption of adult pornography remove the desire to have sex with another adult in the long term? Or does it reinforce the sexually desirable characteristics of adults?
I get that it’s not necessarily simple, however… Firstly, surely streaming companies could push for a standard formatting to make their lives easier. And second, why does a track that was previously explicit suddenly start playing as the clean version one day? Why is the data for it continually being changed?
It was a me problem. I had been logged out and not noticed. I am so sorry.