zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼

Il faut imaginer Camus hébété.

website

  • 3 Posts
  • 121 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle



  • It’s a grand idea to make an index, not only for better exposure, but I bet it also makes it easier for FNIC communities to handle potential problems in unity - if they want to.

    yeah, there is also a matrix space where i’m doing anything i can democratically as well

    I apologize for making assumptions. It is most definitely a good idea to not have the whole of Lemmies Imaginary communities depend on a single persons whims

    don’t apologise! (i did steal their naming convention as well)

    Though I’ve personally never had any beef with INE, we often see how bad such communities can end up.

    neither did i; but better safe than sorry and all that (also i just made !imaginarytrains@lemm.ee because nobody else would, and it’s just sort of snowballed from there - i didn’t know if people would have beef with me, so i don’t want to dictate what happens everywhere)







  • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.eetoNew Communities@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    personally i think that’s not a great answer

    So, there is a mixed bag of thought on this that I read up on before creating the domain, but tl;dr - .zip is a valid TLD and will be recognised by all browsers etc as such. There are lots of new TLDs being created and they’ll be in the same boat.

    yes, it is. .scr is also a valid executable that windows pcs will run, but i wouldn’t go about distributing programmes as such

    .zip domains also come with higher levels of mandatory security and require an SSL certificate to display a webpage, which is another layer of security.

    almost all websites do that now, but man-in-the-middle attacks aren’t really the issue with .zip domains

    On the flip side, yes someone will probably try to fake a zip file with it and send the link around, but (and people are free to disagree with me here!) this is basic Internet security and you shouldn’t be clicking links to places you weren’t expecting.

    this issue isn’t clicking links to places you weren’t expecting, but clicking a link to a place you were expecting. if i send you an email saying “i sent you the invoice.zip you asked me to”; then you’d be expecting that link to open the invoice zip file

    especially on lemmy, as links often follow the format “https:⧸⧸domain.com⧸c⧸topic@differentdomain.com

    Federation won’t be affected by anything and we’d need to be manually defederated like normal.

    this is true (although anyone that has ||.zip^ blocked won’t see images hosted on lemmy.zip)

    People/companies may decide to block .zip domains but that is a knee-jerk reaction.

    i think it’s a necessary reaction. i’ve blocked .zip on both my parents’ computers (and my own, but i at least know how to disable it for specific sites). now admittedly they’re unlikely to be using lemmy[1], but you get the picture

    Bad actors will exist (and have existed before)

    yes. but giving them more attack vectors isn’t the best idea

    and with the way TLDs are heading before long you’ll probably be able to generate anything as a TLD, after all they’re just name friendly pointers to an IP address.

    this may be true, but A) we’re not there yet, and B) that doesn’t mean it’s a good thing (or relevant)

    In summary, it’s not caused us any issues yet, I dont forsee it causing us any issues, but if it did, then we’ll cross that bridge when we get there!

    this is not the best attitude, as (as @quortez says), lemmy doesn’t currently allow migration or re-federation

    points 3 & 8 are the most pertinent.

    (sorry it’s long, but i might link to this in future so i wanted it somewhat comprehensive)


    1. although i have just set up a lemmy acct. for someone a similar age, and only slightly more tech-savvy ↩︎





  • I had to look up Fitts’s law, and I’m not sure I get it. Could you explain what you mean?

    basically; the speed that it takes to click a button is dependant on the size of the button and the distance from the cursor. however, buttons at the edge of the screen have effectively infinite size, as they can’t be overshot. the most used actions should be placed there, as they are the easiest to click by muscle memory (particularly the corners, as they have infinite size in both dimensions)

    on windows, kde, cinnamon, etc.; by default the bottom left is start, the bottom right is show desktop (this one i can’t explain), and the top right is close maximised window. the top of the screen is also used for other window-related actions like minimise, restore, change csd tabs, etc.

    gnome flouts this by having most of the top of the screen doing nothing (most of it is completely empty) apart from rarely used actions like calendar and power. and the bottom right and left doing nothing[1]

    did i explain well?

    ETA: I kinda feel like mine was about KDE not being a fit for me personally, and yours was a slam on Gnome rather than a statement of personal preference.

    nah it was very much a personal thing: some people like having a minimal and clutter-free feature set; i like having as many features as possible, because then i find features i didn’t even know i liked.[2]

    as for the top bar: this one confuses me - it just seems objectively bad. but obviously it’s not as some people clearly like it. i haven’t had anyone actually explain to me why, though


    1. i mean they also ignore it in other ways, too ↩︎

    2. i didn’t know how useful a terminal embedded in the file manager would be until i started using dolphin, now i can’t do without it ↩︎