Nyan Cat, but different
Nyan Cat, but different
https://releases.grayjay.app/app-arm64-v8a-release.apk
Still in alpha and the source code is not public yet, but full release is September at the latest I think.
Theres also GrayJay, its pretty new tho
I wish them luck with that!
Weirdly enough, I went to a book store one time, picked up one of his newer books, didn’t think I’d like it from the summary, but I read the first few pages and was hooked. Had to leave so I figured I would read the rest by downloading from libgen.is…
First time I’ve felt significantly disappointed not being able to read a book :'(
No, he just said AI isn’t like human brains because its a “statistical machine”. What I’m asking is how he knows that human brains aren’t statistical machines?
Human brains aren’t that good at direct math calculation either!
Also he definitely didn’t explain what “lost art” is.
YT: Revanced & Firefox w/ extensions
Papers: SciHub ofc
Books: libgen, or zlib occasionally
Manga: Tachiyomi
Anime: 9anime usually
Anything else: consult the megathread :)
How do you know human brains don’t work in roughly the same way chatbots and image generators work?
What is art? And what does it mean for it to become “lost”?
Not to mention, what prevents a future release of the feature either turning the percentage to 0% or removing the hold-back entirely?
Imo thats like the main issue here. Google tweaks chromium changing a single number and everything goes to shit. This proposal is a trojan horse!
your devs will just write other server backend code that is forked off of yours that won’t “hold back”.
Isn’t it the client (i.e. the browser) that holds back randomly? The server for any service can’t force clients to send an attestation.
An alternative idea to allow a user to be apart of multiple instances simultaneously: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3416
Oh idk, maybe people actually like to use online services without interruptions? I’ve already had to recreate my lemmy account twice! (vlemmy.net and lemmy.fmhy.ml both went down)
Rage is profitable!
What should be your reason? Why is wanting the right to use whatever software I want not a good reason?
Software is not weed, it is not an automatic assault rifle, it is information. You could literally speak the binary encoding of the software aloud if you had enough time, and I’m pretty sure freedom of speech is a right everyone has.
And which person from the 1950s
Love GrapheneOS, don’t love the weird combative community culture, or (former) lead developer tho…
Hmmm… words used in not-satiric circumstances where the true meaning isn’t the intended meaning is a bit confusing…
Hmmm, I guess I don’t like the reasoning “extreme version of complicated idea is bad, therefore the idea is bad in general”. Like its fine to dislike an idea’s extremes, but it would be disingenuous to also dismiss its more moderate forms.
everyone is equal and thus should have equal rights and treatment under the law
Isn’t that like the definition of (clasical) liberalism?
Does anyone else see “removed” in this comment? Is the instance editing comments to censor certain words or is it just the user?