1·
9 months agoYeah cause leaving companies and the super rich to self regulate has worked so well.
ThenThreeMore
- 0 Posts
- 116 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 26th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ it’s not in the public sphere but your private collection, so you do you chap.
In my opinion privately owned art of a high enough cultural value should either not be allowed to be privately owned, or if it is then it should have to be on permanent loan to free admission public galleries. But that’s not the case.
1·9 months agoProdigy is in about the right time period too.
0·9 months agoLeave won by a margin of 3.78%. There was also very little talk of leaving the single market. In fact much of the talk that there was of that came from the Remain campaign and was shouted down as project fear.
01·10 months agoThe links to Wikipedia are actual citations to real sources
I read an interesting article a few years ago about the Wikipedia source problem. It did a dive into how sources that seem legitimate on Wikipedia can and up citing sources that are less so. They were able to trace back the citations to Wikipedia itself. So no, they’re not always real sources.
LLMs basically just generate something that looks like the link to a credible source which might support what it’s said. It doesn’t care if its “source” actually supports what it says.
Which is why you read the page it has linked for you as a source. Unless you’re trying to say it full on generates a page for you.
What I mean is I use it to get the links to those sources. Like when you use Wikipedia as a jumping off point. I don’t think we’re at the point yet where we have the problem Wikipedia sometimes has that the sources used sometimes themselves just cite Wikipedia.
I’ve found bing ai is quite good if you ask for the source after anything it spits out.
1·1 year agoIt’s because it’s the data protection act which is the UK implementation of GDPR.
So Clearview would have been subject to GDPR if it sold its services to UK police or government authorities or commercial entities, but because it doesn’t, it can do whatever the hell it wants with UK people’s data - this is at best puzzling, at worst nonsensical.
While on an individual law level it’s extremely frustrating the article has a quote which makes perfect sense.
it is not for one government to seek to bind or control the activities of another sovereign state
If that wasn’t a concept in law any country could pass any law in and expect it to apply internationally.
Only if you’re doing so in an official governmental capacity for your country.
The article is basically that they won the appeal because they only provide services to governments and law enforcement (having previously withdrawn their services to businesses because they lost a lawsuit in the USA)
5·1 year agoMainly just the USA from looking at that really.
Look at my watch and wonder when it’s socially acceptable to leave.
3 - Michael Burnham is so annoying self centered and needy. If they’d moved to being a more ensemble cast sooner and not had it seem like they thought the universe revolved around her then it could have got a solid 6.
T’Pol says so in ENT
Gotta pre euro money. As fuel pumps in Europe work in litres.
With the size of the community here? Yes very much.
It might be worth it if here gets as big as Reddit.
Takes a few episodes to get going but by the end of the season I’d rank it as the second best new era Trek after SNW.
Could just get a netflix subscription if you’re happy to wait a couple of months.
https://www.startrek.com/en-un/news/star-trek-prodigy-to-stream-on-netflix
Or if you want it and don’t want them to be able to take it away again
At least you’ll be able to find it on the high seas now, rather than it rotting on some hard drive in the back of a cupboard.
Better than spending it giving tax breaks to the rich or subsidising companies that are destroying the planet.