![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/80c24909-8a49-4cb6-9bdd-4b8621b8cf1d.jpeg)
Is this eduroam?
Is this eduroam?
To me, Endless OS seems to be the best fit for you; install it once and you never ever have to give it a second glance for troubleshooting or whatsoever. It achieves this through using “a read-only root file system managed by OSTree with apps installed using Flatpak.”. This translates to:
filesystem based encryption is really cool.
Can’t agree more.
Sorry to be that guy, but you should just sit down and go over Qubes OS’ documentation. Some specific entries that might prove useful:
If you ask me, read a lot more beyond these. But if you really got no time, then at least suffice with the aforementioned.
Wish ya good luck!
Mandatory read on the subject for the curious (also goes over Secure Boot, Boot Guard etc):
The pursuit of Freedom led me to Linux.
Are you referring to Qubes OS? If so, what do you mean exactly with hardware support?
I think we’ve probably already spoken on the matter.
That’s definitely possible. Unfortunately, I don’t recall it 😅.
Indeed, Lemmy has a serious dearth of users interested and using secure distros over the averages.
It’s definitely better at this than the platform that starts with an “R” and rhymes with “shit”.
Thanks for your efforts; I do not know how to follow users on Lemmy but if I did I’d follow you. Do you have a blog/any other forum you’re more active on?
That’s such a compliment. This is definitely one of the nicest things I’ve read on Lemmy. I really appreciate it.
Unfortunately, I’m only somewhat active on Lemmy. FWIW, consider checking out the following places if you haven’t yet:
And, of course, Qubes OS’ forums.
Personally, I find it difficult to justify the time to learn Secureblue (especially the immutable part) or NixOS on Qubes because custom DispVMs with curated salt states work so well already. I’m interested in use-cases that will improve my security but I haven’t found any dialogue on this yet. If you do have opinions on this and know where I can look, I would greatly appreciate it!
As I’ve previously alluded to, I don’t have any hands-on experience with Qubes OS yet. So, I don’t think I can contribute meaningfully in this discussion. However, IIRC, there are some discussions found on the forums/discussions page for Qubes OS.
Aight. I’m glad to hear that that has been resolved. I’d love to hear about your experiences on secureblue, so consider to report back. Finally, note that as a hardened distro, some things might work differently from what you’d expect. So be prepared to relearn a thing or two 😉.
Currently I got no time to go over this in more length. So apologies*. However, I still want to offer/provide a brief and concise answer. I will (hopefully tomorrow) return at this in more length.
Now i already setup my container & install some packages in it but the shortcut is missing from application launcher (a.k.a start menu), how i can link the shortcut from package inside toolbox to host application launcher ?
Short answer is that Toolbx for a long time (and perhaps still) didn’t really support this feature. Sure, you could make it work, but it was a bit hacky. If this is a concern of yours, consider switching over to Distrobox. With distrobox, it’s as easy as (while inside the container) distrobox-export --app <name app>
. I will return at this tomorrow with the Toolbx way to do the same. I will also explore how Distrobox fares compared to Toolbx etc.
If i made a file (ex text file) from inside container will it show in Home directory ?
Yes if you’ve saved it in the Home directory to begin with.
If something crashed inside container will it also crashed my host system ?
Nope.
Why some packages doesn’t work inside container like Wine, Lutris, or Bottles ?
Interesting. I don’t recall ever experiencing problems with either Wine or Lutris inside a Toolbx/Distrobox container. I’m also confident that Bottles should work.
Does it’s need special dependencies to make it work ?
This is definitely something that might be at play. Consider reporting the terminal output whenever you try to work with Wine, Lutris and Bottles.
Furthermore, expect some containerized solutions tomorrow for these 😉.
Can packages that modifying system (ex green tunnel, vmware, or QEMU, & hblock ) work fine ?
I’m not familiar with all of them. Though, you may expect troubles. I do recall I had to resort to rpm-ostree
in order to make QEMU work. However, it’s a fast moving space, so I wouldn’t be surprised if Toolbx/Distrobox-based solutions exist for this. For example, since relatively recently, it has been possible to have a functioning Waydroid within Distrobox. I will also more exhaustively go over this matter tomorrow.
Whonix is an OS exclusively meant to be used within a VM; at least, until Whonix-Host is released. Therefore, I didn’t include it as it’s not actually competing within the same space; as it can be run on any of the aforementioned systems within a VM. Finally, it’s worth noting that by its own documentation, it’s desirable to do so with Qubes OS.
Please allow me to link to an earlier comment of mine that goes over this in more length. You may also find it copied-and-pasted down below:
First of all, apologies for delaying this answer.
Disclaimer:
Qubes OS >> secureblue >~ Kicksecure
Context: Answering this question puts me in a genuinely conflicted position 😅. I have immense respect for the Kicksecure project, its maintainers and/or developers. Their contributions have been invaluable, inspiring many others to pursue similar goals. Unsurprisingly, some of their work is also found in secureblue. So, to me, it feels unappreciative and/or ungrateful to criticize them beyond what I’ve already done. However, I will honor your request for the sake of providing a comprehensive and balanced perspective on the project’s current state and potential areas for improvement.
Considerations: It’s important to approach this critique with nuance. Kicksecure has been around for over a decade, and their initial decisions likely made the most sense when they started. However, the Linux ecosystem has changed dramatically over the last few years, causing some of their choices to age less gracefully. Unfortunately, like most similar projects, there’s insufficient manpower to retroactively redo some of their earlier work. Consequently, many current decisions might be made for pragmatic rather than idealistic reasons. Note that the criticisms raised below lean more towards the idealistic side. If resources allowed, I wouldn’t be surprised if the team would love to address these issues. Finally, it’s worth noting that the project has sound justifications for their decisions. It’s simply not all black and white.
With that out of the way, here’s my additional criticism along with comparisons to Qubes OS and secureblue:
What are the main advantages of using this, that make it more secure?
More secure compared to your average distro? Or more secure compared to a specific set of distros? Unless, this is properly specified, this comment could become very unwieldy 😅.
Thanks in advance for specifying!
I daily drive secureblue; or, to be more precise, its bluefin-main-userns-hardened
image.
“Why?”, you ask. Because security is my number one priority.
I dismiss other often mentioned hardened systems for the following reasons:
Nix, the package manager, is distro-agnostic. Add Home Manager on top of it and you’re good to go; both packages and dotfiles are dealt with.
Thanks for clarifying!
IMO immutable distros aren’t a best fit for a desktop computer. It can do so much more than gaming and turning it into a dedicated console is a step back if a normal linux distro can do just as well.
I would personally nuance this to: “Current iterations of ‘immutable distros’ that have evolved from traditional distros haven’t matured sufficiently yet to tackle 99.99% of the use cases ‘easily’.” The exact number on the percentage I don’t know. I believe most people that use their PCs as a glorified app launcher should be more than fine. But we start experiencing major difficulties the very moment that (a)kmods are involved; some of which are ‘supported’~ish, while others certainly aren’t.
But, I simply fail to see why a future iteration would not be able to solve related issues.
Thank you. This does give an idea.
It has been my pleasure.
Follow up question : Is Arch really that good?
Depends entirely on your needs. There is a use case for Arch. However, if you’re completely new to Linux, then it’s very likely that a ‘slower’-moving distro (like (anything based on) Debian (or Ubuntu)) might better suit you.
It’s a steering wheel driver.
Could you perhaps be more precise? Is it a specific one? Or are there a multitude of steering wheel drivers that satisfy your needs?
And virtualbox.
Do you specifically need VirtualBox? Or would Qemu/KVM satisfy your needs?
IIRC VirtualBox requires kernel mods. Therefore, you would have to create your own images 😅 in which said kernel mod is included. FWIW, both uBlue’s templates and BlueBuild do a wonderful job at streamlining this process.
Or…, as alluded before, you don’t necessarily need VirtualBox. But, instead, Qemu/KVM perfectly satisfy your needs. Then, you can just run ujust setup-virtualization
. After which you reboot, and you would be good to go.
In a lot of educational institutions over the world, they truly on eduroam for their bidding. While it’s not perfect, it does offer a python script by which proper connection to the network is established. I guess it’s unfortunate to know that it’s not eduroam then, as I wouldn’t know what the solution would be.