burrp

Correct, anyone who has shell access to the server(s) the instance is running on could query the database.

A leaf node is a vector to spam/attack the rest of the network. The network is only as strong as its weakest node.

Edit: i.e. an instance owner with a weak shell password

This is the view an admin has for a user via the existing Lemmy web UI. No email or IP is visible.

The user’s data would only be available to someone with direct access to the database.

https://www.noip.com/free

You misunderstood. I said the public availability does not grant OpenAI the right to use content improperly. The authors should also sue the party who leaked their works without license.

I’d love to know the source for the works that were allegedly violated. Presuming OpenAI didn’t scour zlib/libgen for the books, where on the net were the cleartext copies of their writings stored?

Being stored in cleartext publicly on the net does not grant OpenAI the right to misuse their art, but the authors need to go after the entity that leaked their works.

Admins paid off? That’s absurd. Lemmy.world are taking a moderate wait-and-see approach. I disagree with that stance, but to insinuate they are corrupt because they aren’t as reactionary as you are is ridiculous.

Keep it civil.

My distrust is in Google, not technology.

You trust Google to use quantum tech for purely scientific pursuits?

No thanks.

This device should be seized and destroyed. Google have constructed a weapon.

Where is the indication that lemmy.world have “bent the knee”?

of course they can. none of this is private.

I fail to see a reason for Meta to be an ActivityPub peer except to stifle growth of our open source network of communities. Big Tech want silos.